Is Daniel Craig the best bond since sean connery?

Answer 1

NO NO NO NO NO NONONONONONONONONONO !!!!!!
Hellllllllllll NOOOOOOOO !!!! Sean Connery was and is the BEST "james bond" and then pierce brosnan comes second

Answer 2

Connery is the original, and the standard by which all other Bonds are measured. This question is entirely opinion based, so here's mine:

Sean Connery: A- (although he's the original and best, he was much more rugged and manly than the spy in Ian Fleming's novels. He was also a Scot.)

Roger Moore: B+ (a close second. His humor and wit suited Bond well, as did his background as an actor playing a spy in the Saint. Critics would consider him a bit of a lightweight for the part, but he made some great classic Bond films.)

George Lazenby: D- (he sucked.)

Timothy Dalton: D (he seemed more concerned with putting his own spin on Bond than with playing the character. He also had the misfortune of some crummy scripts.)

Pierce Brosnan: B (he had the look, the charm, and ever since his Remington Steele days, everybody knew he had Bond in him. He did a great job, but the movies themselves had become gimmicky and modernized.)

Daniel Craig: B- (he has a good look, and he had the original Bond movie thrown his way, but he's still got a lot to prove. Critics may call him the best Bond ever, but the fans never will, no matter what he does. Still, I'm hoping we see some more great Bond films from him.)

Answer 3

Connery is the unique, and the regularly utilized with the aid of which all different Bonds are measured. this question is fullyyt opinion based, so this is mine: Sean Connery: A- (notwithstanding he's the unique and superb, he became lots greater rugged and manly than the undercover agent in Ian Fleming's novels. He became additionally a Scot.) Roger Moore: B+ (a particular 2nd. His humor and wit appropriate Bond nicely, as did his background as an actor enjoying a undercover agent interior the Saint. Critics might evaluate him fairly a mild-weight for the area, yet he made some super classic Bond movies.) George Lazenby: D- (he sucked.) Timothy Dalton: D (he looked greater involved with putting his very own spin on Bond than with enjoying the character. He additionally had the misfortune of a few crummy scripts.) Pierce Brosnan: B (he had the look, the charm, and ever for the reason that his Remington Steele days, each physique knew he had Bond in him. He did an incredible job, however the flicks themselves had grow to be gimmicky and modernized.) Daniel Craig: B- (he has a competent look, and he had the unique Bond action picture thrown his way, yet he continues to be have been given lots to tutor. Critics might call him the wonderful Bond ever, however the followers in no way will, no remember what he does. nevertheless, i'm hoping we see some greater super Bond movies from him.)

Answer 4

In my humble opinion, Sean Connery is still the only Bond worth the status.

Daniel Craig is more like a wannabe British mobster - can't wipe Layer Cake out of my mind!

Answer 5

NO! Im my opinion Sean Connery is still the best. Here they are in order from best to worst in my opinion.

1. Sean Connery
2. Roger Moore
3. Perce Brosnon
4. Timithy Dalton
5. George Lazenby
6. Daneil Craeg

Answer 6

Yes. On the Bond rating scale, he is a second after Sir Connery. Yum.

Answer 7

No. Sean Connery will always be the best.

Answer 8

Yes.

More reminiscent of Connery in Dr. NO.

Answer 9

Well the critics said that Daniel is the best Bond ever.

Answer 10

yeah, there will never be anyone better then Sean Connery, because, it was HE, who created the ledgend...