English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Discussions of these two topics seem to bring out the worst in people.

2007-01-07 17:10:25 · 9 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Social Science Psychology

9 answers

you know it, mate.
race also a hotbed....of erm, of passionate discussions.

2007-01-07 17:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by atlas shrugged and so do i 5 · 0 0

I wouldn't say it's a surefire way to get into trouble, but it certainly does lead into some heated discussions. First thing is, make sure it's understood ahead of time that total agreement is not going to be reached. It's the old "agree to disagree" philosophy. Make sure you own your issues. It can be disconcerting to go into a discussion all fired up, then have your proverbial clock cleaned by somebody else who knew the issue better than you. Do your homework. Avoid absolute certain terms. That invites a challenge. Avoid namecalling. It's possible that someone could have the same information as you, but not share your opinion about it. That doesn't make them stupid, in fact, you should relish the challenge, not resort to childishness. If all else fails, avoid the subject around those touchy individuals.

As a conservative, one of the most interesting people at work is a liberal. We have both agreed to the above terms and have had some great debates. Just keep it clean and come out swinging!

2007-01-07 17:36:52 · answer #2 · answered by Thegustaffa 6 · 0 0

good question. paradoxically the Bible become written by way of 40 authors who had about 40 diverse political agendas as to the thanks to regulate their followers. contradictions were sure to take position: some samples: God is considered and heard Ex 33:23/ Ex 33:11/ Gen 3:9,10/ Gen 32:30/ Is 6:a million/ Ex 24:9-11 God is invisible and can't be heard John a million:18/ John 5:37/ Ex 33:20/ a million Tim 6:16 5. God is drained and rests Ex 31:17 God is by no ability drained and by no ability rests Is 40:28 6. God is everywhere modern, sees and is conventional with all issues Prov 15:3/ playstation 139:7-10/ pastime 34:22,21 God isn't everywhere modern, neither sees nor is conventional with all issues Gen 11:5/ Gen 18:20,21/ Gen 3:8 8. God is all effectual Jer 32:27/ Matt 19:26 God isn't all effectual Judg a million:19 9. God is unchangeable James a million:17/ Mal 3:6/ Ezek 24:14/ Num 23:19 God is changeable Gen 6:6/ Jonah 3:10/ a million Sam 2:30,31/ 2 Kings 20:a million,4,5,6/ Ex 33:a million,3,17,14

2016-12-28 09:13:00 · answer #3 · answered by kunich 4 · 0 0

Yes, when the issue around that discussion is "who is right and who is wrong" and when at the end of the discussion the people involved expect to be winners or losers. There is no best solution to what should you believe in or how the world should be, but a lot of people still fight to impose their version as the right one. And when they don't succeed it's like their worlds fall apart.

People have a lot of reasons to stick to their views, because most act like belief is reality, but also because in political and religious subjects a main issue is protection. So if they would give up their belief, they think somebody will get into trouble. It's like if you would give up the belief that there are bears in front of your cave, you might get out without fear and they will eat you. Or if you'll believe something else, God will punish you.

2007-01-07 17:32:50 · answer #4 · answered by Ronald Vexa 3 · 0 0

Try asking people's salaries if you want a surefire way to get into trouble!

2007-01-07 19:36:59 · answer #5 · answered by Katherine W 7 · 0 0

Yup, I agree and have decided when religion or polict conversations come up, I excuse myself or not provide my opinion because everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but others may not see it that way. There's always one person that wants to challenge another.

2007-01-07 17:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by gigi 2 · 0 0

Yes and no- depends on how you approach them in your choice of words; that is what debates are for. - constructive criticism. Opinions are one thing, but having all the facts are another- could mean one thing to me and vice versa to someone else. make sense? Some are very passionate about their views that they fail to see alternatives or hear someone else's theories- a form of closemindedness, if you care to oblige me.

2007-01-07 17:22:57 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

no...i don't think it's 'trouble.' I think it can bring out the best in spirited conversation!

2007-01-07 17:17:31 · answer #8 · answered by prekinpdx 7 · 0 0

Yes it sure is., especially in the bedroom...............................

2007-01-07 17:15:58 · answer #9 · answered by gerbare 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers