1st landing on the moon?

Question

I have come across the recent leak of info from NASA that when Neil Armstrong (NA) was near to the moon (before landing), he saw 2 UFOs on the moon & he discussed with the NASA's master control facility (MCF). NA informed MCF that they are watching us and we don't know what they will do? He was amazed by the size of UFOs and described to MCF as he is completely shocked. MCF was broadcasting that conversation live on the radio and when they heard from NA about this, they immediately un-plugged the broadcasting, so that people and the rest of the world would not now. However, it remained as "top secret" until now and what had NASA really reveled out there is not spoken to the world officially. It is the fact that samples of sand of the moon shows that it was existed long before the earth. NA saw there few very giant establishments and they were partially destroyed, but photographs of that structure was taken by NA. This leakage has revealed a new conspiracy on the real facts

Answer 1

You are a victim of a long-standing Internet hoax.

Answer 2

To begin with Neil Armstrong was not alone. Indeed there were UFO's near the moon as the US astronauts approached the moon and while they were on the moon. (By the way, if a UFO in ON the moon, it is not flying, and therefore only a UO) The USSR had sent unmanned probes to the moon at about the same time, without informing NASA, and if my memory serves me correctly one of them plummited into the moon at about the time the astronauts were walking on the moon. The impact was picked up by the sizemograph which Armstrong and Aldrin deployed on the moon.

I was fortunate enough to have lived through that period of time.

I find it incredible how misinformation can be so badly construed over time. Sometimes I wonder what actually happend in history, before I was around!

Answer 3

what's that solid resource?(we've not proved that UFOs and extraterrestrial beings exist, so I won't say that the extraterrestrial beings and their UFOs have been at the back of this.) that's actual that Neil Armstrong become the 1st to land on the moon. If i'm no longer incorrect, our moon can quite be a planet IF it revolves the solar. yet via fact it revolves the Earth, that's a satellite tv for pc, and not a planet. The moon become formed by applying the enormous Bang which become a reasonably huge explosion. The moon's revolution around the Earth must be via gravitational stress. Now, i quite do no longer have faith that extraterrestrial beings exist yet i've got faith that there are existence varieties on different planets that are in different galaxies. consistent with danger those alien sightings have been some area dirt which won't be able to be seen by applying the bare eye. i desire this clears your doubts. by applying the way, the form? What shape? (heavily, locate something useful, ok? (:) AND, XxYahoo!xX dunno why romesh_model suggested such issues... strange... *shrugs*

Answer 4

A new conspiracy theory on real facts?

That sentence right there should throw up the red flag.

Oh, and if the moon existed before the earch, who or what did it orbit? The mother alien? Are you a scientologist? Should of known.....

Answer 5

Don't worry Truth shall be out 1 day . But it might be possible that NASA hid something .

Answer 6

cant say but my grandma told me about this cause i am way too young to have lived back then cause i am 13 but i think that he was the first person

Answer 7

STOP BELEIVEING IN FOOLISHNESS

HOW DID YOUR FRIENDS GET ALL THESE COMMON SENSE

LOGIC EXPLANATION PUT TOGETHER FROM AN

IMAGINARY A NON COMMUMUNICATION SCRIPT

EXPLAIN THAT ONE?

Answer 8

NASA thats not fare.

Answer 9

they didn't actually land on the moon, that was all Hollywood.