I got into an argument with my boyfriend over something dumb. He was leaving for work, and he stormed out after we both failed at attempting to de-escalate the situation. He knows I hate it when he leaves angry because we're both still upset, and the situation goes unresolved (I hate both). To resolve it, I decided to e-mail him.
The first (unsent) draft of the e-mail was angry. The second version (still unsent) was more rational.
But I'm confused.
I feel like the first version was more honest and addresses a bigger problem. The second version makes me feel like I'm backing down, but it IS closer to a resolution.
Am I somehow giving in by trying to reach a resolution? Am I not giving it enough time (it's been a whole 20 minutes since he left)? Am I trying so hard to resolve arguments that I'm ignoring a bigger issue? Is there really a bigger issue, or is that the irrationality of anger speaking (I suppose no one here would really know that)?
I'm frustrated and confused. Ideas?
2007-01-07
15:48:39
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Other - Family & Relationships
Laura, normally, that's what I try to do, but with him leaving for work, it was difficult to do that. I guess I was more urgent to solve it before he left, and I kept pressing to get it solved, and I think that made it worse. (And now I feel like I'm blaming myself, and I'm not sure if I'm to blame.)
2007-01-07
15:57:02 ·
update #1