I would have to say so... they had the cutting edge Dreadnought Class battleships and their U-Boats. The Royal Navy was just a little behind their technology, but not bi much. The US Navy at the time was behind both Germany and Great Britain. A well-known naval victory for Germany was the Battle of Jutland where the Germans edged out England, but really most of both nations' prized ships were in port during the war, because it simply could not be decided bi sea. The U-Boats were a huge difference, because of all the merchant ships sunk in the North Atlantic shipping lanes, cutting off supplies to British Isles, although they never really were perfected enough for militaristic victories until several years later due to the time period's unreliable torpedo technology.
To me, the German naval war machine was flat-out awesome and well ahead of its time, technologywise. That all would change come the early days of WWII, however.
P.S.>>> a few answers above are completely misinformed... Spitfires did not even become prototypes until nearly two decades later in World War TWO.
2007-01-07 15:40:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by azcuriousm4u 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In WW1 the British Navy was the strongest in the world.
There was only one major sea battle between the british and german fleets and this was the Battle of Jutland.
This is considered to be a draw because although the British lost more ships and men , the germans were so badly damaged they never dared to bring their major ships out of port again to face the British navy.
The U- boat was the most effective german ship but the technology was not far advanced enough to make a decisive difference.
2007-01-07 18:05:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are you so obsessed with Germany??? All these questions, why not just get a book?
Kristen...I'm sorry to have to tell you, but the first sub was designed by the British, and the firs one ever sailed was by a Dutchman. The first TRUE submarine was invented by Americans. The first successful submarine attack was in the united states. The Confederates used a sub called the HUNDLEY during the civil war. The Germans didn't invent the submarine.
2007-01-07 15:33:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by FRANKFUSS 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck no, the British ruled the sea. The Germans had a large amount of U-boats but few surface ships, that is, destroys, etc. They were in the process of building a few aircraft carriers but most of the money went to Uboats. Because of the British navy Hitler couldn't afford to launch an amphibious invasion against England, so he trusted major air raids would soften them up, but ultimately it backfired when the Germans lost catastrophic numbers to the British Spitfire planes.
Japan had a significant navy too until Midway crippled them.
2007-01-07 15:35:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
At Jutland, the Royal army lost more effective ships than the German army. yet regardless of this, the losses sustained by way of the Germans had a larger result on the basically accurate skill of their fleet, and the Royal army nonetheless retained a brilliant numerical benefit, regardless of their losses. On accurate of that, Britain become also construction new warfare ships speedier than Germany. So Germany began to count number more effective on submarine warfare. "ok yet were the british army commonplace for thier ability, rigidity, or some thing like that?" lower back then, the Royal army become the biggest contained in the international. in spite of the undeniable fact that it really is way smaller at present, the Royal army continues to be pretty respected for its ability and proffessionalism. "become the german army very susceptible?" No, the German Grand Imperial Fleet become no longer susceptible contained in the slightest. Infact between the the reason why Britain entered WWI become because they did not pick the German fleet on accurate of issues of Belgian sea ports. The German army also had a extreme ability factor, fantastically with submarines. yet Britain is an island the position you're by no ability more effective than 70 miles remote from the sea, and has a naval custom that dates lower back to Alfred the finished, so it truly is going to continuously have more effective experienced mariners to call on than Germany, which in consumer-friendly words has one north dealing with coast. in the course of the conflict of england, between the topics Germany had that prevented them from an amphibious attack on Britain become the very shown reality that they did no longer have adequate experienced mariners to call on to get their forces onto Britains seashores. even as on D-Day, there have been even British crews crusing the landing craft for American targeted seashores.
2016-12-28 09:04:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by galaz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
anyone who is just answering this question without any prior knowledge is going to say that no it wasn't. But that isnt true at all...the German u-boats terrorized the whole world at this time and was a main reason that they were able to continue fighting at such a high level for so long
2007-01-07 15:44:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by GHAAD 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Germans battled the English, gun to gun, in the Battle of Jutland. The Battle was a draw.
2007-01-07 15:37:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. If they were, they would have prevented the Americans from joining the war.
2007-01-07 15:33:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by All_Dawgs_Go_To_Heaven 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the germans invented the submarine - uboats
2007-01-07 15:34:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kristen 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
no
2007-01-07 15:32:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋