2007-01-07 15:26:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
You have posed a lot of questions about the first World War. I suggest that you read 'History of the First World War' by Sir Basil Liddel Hart. This work was reviewed - 'The outstanding military historian' Sunday Express 'The most influential British military writer of his time' The Spectator 'Scrupulously accurate, brilliantly lucid' British Army Review 'Brilliant...the best one-volume history of the First World War ever likely to be written' Naval Review 'It was always his special talent to be able to express military situations in telling and limpid phrases which would stick in the reader's mind' The Daily Telegraph.
It should sort you out!
2007-01-08 04:44:54 · answer #1 · answered by john b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At the outset the Germans were better equipped and had better weaponry. They had superior aircraft as well until close to the end of the war. The British developed the first tanks during the war. When the Americans joined in 1917 they had by far the best rifles and ammunition.
2007-01-07 23:36:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not really no most nations in WW1 where equally matched. The Germans where better equipped and led than some nations but still struggled like everyone else and as the war went on there quality of there equipment declined.
2007-01-08 01:52:52 · answer #3 · answered by Wonx2150 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were technologically superior yes, but when the Manufacturing might of the allies joined in, they could not make bullets fast enough.
2007-01-07 23:35:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In some things they were; particularly aircraft and artillery. Other stuff; they were on par with everyone else.
2007-01-07 23:29:29 · answer #5 · answered by Finn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, they lost
2007-01-07 23:28:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋