English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This question is open to interpretation so please, answer it the way you understand it.

2007-01-07 12:47:17 · 6 answers · asked by blazenphoenix 4 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

6 answers

Last night at work this 16 y/o delivered a baby. I think if she had been a little more responsible either by using protection or abstinance,then this baby would not have been born to a young girl who was not ready for a baby. She put him up for adoption,but still I think if we were all more sexually responsible there would be lower statistics of stds.unwanted pregancies,abortion and what not. Which could more or less relieve the stress levels on people.

2007-01-07 12:52:54 · answer #1 · answered by lily_shaine 4 · 1 0

Fewer people
Fewer unwanted children
Fewer people on welfare
Fewer broken families (or families that weren't whole to begin with)
Fewer STDs
Higher self esteem because women wouldn't be "giving it up" only to find out that won't keep a man
More respectful attitude toward sex as "special"

2007-01-07 13:11:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No unplanned pregnacies, less people on welfare, less strain on local and state goverenments. More tax money for areas that deserve it, mainly the elderly and war veterans.

2007-01-14 10:48:27 · answer #3 · answered by Chero 2 · 0 0

There would be less homeless children,and less aids and std.and one parent house holds.

2007-01-07 12:53:35 · answer #4 · answered by carpathian3030 6 · 1 0

No STD, no unwanted babies, no abortions, no population boom, no staggering welfare rolls, less angry women (well, that could be wishful thinking).

2007-01-07 13:08:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

People wouldn't be so scared of STD's, leading people to enjoy sex more, leading everybody to be more relaxed, leading to world peace YAY SEX :)

2007-01-07 12:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by Tina 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers