2007-01-07 12:14:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
first of all, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
second of all, some the the ugliest people in the world have the best looking kids.
2007-01-07 12:17:37 · answer #1 · answered by cclleeoo 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What is beautiful exactly? If you have no reference point for what is 'ugly' and what is 'beautiful' then you would have a world full of people who don't know they are beautiful. They would all become just normal and then everyone would start nit-picking between who is more beautiful and less beautiful. Then you would have people who are considered 'ugly'. So the idea that we can only have 'beautiful' people and everyone realizes they are 'beautiful' doesn't exist. It's all pretty subjective. Not everyone gauges beauty by the same standard unless they've been brain-washed into following what someone else believes. Todays fashion industry is a perfect example of brain-washing.
2007-01-07 20:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by Rico Suave 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
EVERYONE on this planet IS beautiful in one way or another.
Besides, who would pick and chose who is "beautiful" enough to breed? Sounds vaguely like what Hitler tried to do, doesn't it?
Very shallow idea. Also, beauty doesn't necessarily mean brains. I'd surround myself with intelligent people ANYDAY instead of just physically beautiful people.
2007-01-07 20:19:04 · answer #3 · answered by tami1215 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're assuming there's some sort of 'beautiful' gene. Remember, the idea of beauty varies by culture, so what an African American things as beautiful, is likely not the same as what person from Thailand finds beautiful.
2007-01-07 20:24:01 · answer #4 · answered by Twin momma as of 11/11 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everyone is beautiful in their own way, except those that have hatred in their hearts. So I wish we could breed only beauty in the world, but evil always follows good.
2007-01-07 20:16:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
there's different definitions of beauty so there may be a beautiful person with a large nose that fits them but if they breed with someone and their child has that big nose that doesnt fit them and theyre deemed ugly then that just proves that theory false.
2007-01-07 20:18:53 · answer #6 · answered by b2k4ever08 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Beauty is balance in features and therefore, a fluke of nature. So no, 2 supermodels will not always get a supermodel child.
2007-01-07 20:19:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
From a scientific point of view yeah, because there wouldn’t be any "ugly genes"... unless the genes morph over time lol this is like the making of a good book. ATTACK OF THE BEAUTIFUL MUTANT PEOPLE!
2007-01-07 20:20:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Some would still be more beautiful than others, so some would stillbe "ugly" by comparison.
2007-01-07 20:17:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Doubt it--I've seen some pretty homely kids with good-looking parents. And no, they weren't adopted.
2007-01-07 20:17:53 · answer #10 · answered by warriorwoman 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋