wwe travels makes more moeny and does films and other stuff? first tna is based in florida they dont need to travel. and they give a light workload on there wrestlers like 3 or 4 shows a month, second of course wwe has more money theve been around like 50 years whole tna has been around four. and wwe does movies. yeah um last i checked tna was a WRESTLING company. and how many of the wwe films were actually succesful. ahhh none. how about match quality. samoa joe vs angle, rhino vs styles, daniels vs sabin. sting vs abyss vs cage. lol wwe has cena vs umaga and WOW CENA VS K FED. also wwe doesnt care about its idiot fans, survivor series was one of the worst ppv it had virtually no build up and none of the matches were over 15 min long. at the end of survivor series the crowd was chanting boring,. i mean tna chants at a wwe event that shows more and more people are going to tna. cena and batista will be the death of the wwe
2007-01-07 11:50:30 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
So I guess having spares like Jeff Jarrett and Ron Killings as champ is better than Batistia and Cena ? What about Abyss , " Mr. I want to be Kane ", that's better. Having spares like Shane Douglas parade around like he was somebody . Digging up Sting , Luger , Steiner and Nash to bring in ratings. What do they draw in ratings, last I checked .8 to a 1 was less than the WWE draws for their 2 am Sunday highlight show. That show has a collection of men who couldn't sell their souls much less MSG. Don't worry people Spike will get sick of shelling out money for a bad product. They only put TNA on TV to get back at Vince for leaving for a better deal. Hopefully by 2008 you can go back to seeing this group of mid carders on their weekly PPV's
2007-01-08 02:19:11 · answer #1 · answered by mgorski77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go TNA. I have high hopes for the success of TNA. They have so much potential and have come a long way!! Sting, Kurt Angle, Christian, AJ Styles, Samoa Joe, Abyss, Jeff Jarrett, Rhino, Scott Steiner, Christopher Daniels, Ron Killings, etc. Great roaster!!! I have a feeling Chris Benoit and Chris Jericho are next to TNA!!
2007-01-07 18:33:32 · answer #2 · answered by bdaly08 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All true.
I dont see why anyone would buy NYrevolution over TNA's final resolution. I guess if you like gimmicks are long promos wwe is fine, when it's free. But if i'm paying for wrestling i want to see wrestling.
youre right, lets see...would i rather see Angle vs Joe in a friggin IRON MAN match or a talentless gimmick wrestle a fat, talentless gimmick.
wwe is good for children and casual fans.
TNA is where the real wrestling fans are heading.
2007-01-07 12:03:43 · answer #3 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE (c) CM Punk WWE Intercontinental (c) Cody Rhodes TNA Tag team (c) Samoa & Magnus TNA x-branch CHamp Austin Aries WWE Divas (c) Beth Phoniex TNA Knockout (c): Gail & Madison particular: Snookie
2016-12-28 08:36:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
u r so right. wwe has fallen off considerably in the past 5 years. once tna gets a better timeslot and more money, wwe is in trouble.
2007-01-07 13:34:32 · answer #5 · answered by da realest 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all wrestling shows seem like a soap opera show to me.
2007-01-07 12:39:28 · answer #6 · answered by vy0441 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋