English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What do you think? And no shot in the dark stuff, what do you really think?

2007-01-07 10:41:03 · 18 answers · asked by NDK 2 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

18 answers

Sometimes people explore only one set of facts, whether scientific or from Scripture. I have a huge respect for science and the scientific community. But, I am a creationist. It's not a matter of blind faith. It's a conclusion based on different observations and perceptions. Basic questions like how can order come from chaos? How can intellect be determined came as an evolutionary process? Those are just two of many. In the matter of Scripture there is a lot unsupported presupposition. In many ways it is harder to study Scripture than pure science because it takes discernment, patience, and desire to study and by its nature looks beyond our physical realm. It is hard because error and baseless opinion are difficult to sort out. Eventually you have to make a choice. I believe an eternity waits. I want to know how to prepare for it. I believe that the God who created can also preserve His message to us.

2007-01-07 12:46:28 · answer #1 · answered by youngatheart 3 · 1 3

Evolution.

2007-01-07 16:37:35 · answer #2 · answered by novangelis 7 · 3 1

Evolution because lots of fossils between species have been found and evolution has been observed in action as in changes of the birds on the Galapagos Islands in as little as ten years and because, if evolution did not work as described, we would not have all the different breeds of dogs, cats, and cattle that we have which are the result of man speeding up the processes of evolution by increased selection, which occurs all the time in nature.

2007-01-07 10:46:57 · answer #3 · answered by Mike1942f 7 · 3 1

creation evolution is a man made theory . There is no other evolutionists subject to compare therefore how can u conclude
only the creation which does exist evolution does not

2007-01-08 00:02:27 · answer #4 · answered by adelbert321 2 · 1 1

Evolution requires evidence based research, and thinking logistically. Creationism is a safe plan where you just accept what is presented to you and not bother to expand your horizons are ask questions. I prefer Evolution, but if people want to believe that Genesis story, well good for them.

2007-01-07 10:52:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Evolution, every time. Just have a browse through the links below. Every Creationist claim is shot down in flames by true science, not by belief in fables that were written thousands of years before the invention of the two things that literally opened man's eyes, namely the telescope and the microscope.

This is for "qwerty" http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/
the bridge between fish and amphibians

2007-01-07 18:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Evolution.. Duhh..! Seriously.! Cause and effect is the obvious reasoning, and evolution is so logical even for a small kid the evidence is plain to see. I think creation is more of a metaphor.

2007-01-07 11:15:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I'm an engineer and a creationist. My belief is that God did create the world and all the processes and products over a short period of time(short in terms of God's timeframe). However, being an engineer, I don't shut out every piece of evidence and scientific work just because someone else claims that it contradicts the existence of God. I simply believe that what we learn through science further explains to us what God did, and how he did it. I believe evolution and adaptation do occur, but not that it all started that way. The more we know through science, the better we will be prepared for the future.

2007-01-07 11:05:08 · answer #8 · answered by bkc99xx 6 · 0 3

Evolution. Hands down.

2007-01-07 10:48:36 · answer #9 · answered by gebobs 6 · 3 1

Creation! Evolution has never passed the test of the "Scientific Method" Creation , not the creationists ideas, has always.

The story of the "Emperor's New Cloths"--presents the scenario, especially one part. The two tailors used the excuse that those who do not "see the 'invisible' cloth are not intelligent. Was there any substance to the cloth ,obviously not?

What have the evolutionist claimed for those who cannot comprehend (the non-substance)evolution--Very little intelligence? There is nothing there to comprehend!
Blind faith in science is just as perverted as in religion.

2007-01-07 11:35:26 · answer #10 · answered by THA 5 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers