Did you know, that although you may see things that are not there, you won't NOT see things that ARE there?
2007-01-07 09:26:57 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Thats the dumbest question I ever saw.
2007-01-07 09:28:30 · update #1
I knew that!
2007-01-07 09:30:14 · answer #1 · answered by John16 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It isn't true as a double negative, or as a direct statement. Some people are blind. Sometimes it's dark. Bi-focal 3-d vision has a "blind spot" phenomenon, about a foot away from the eyes where the line of sight of both eyes crosses and the brain can't process the information so it substitutes an optical illusion. These are just some examples.
2007-01-07 18:05:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the second part of the statement has a double negative Won't, not) it becomes a positive and simply states you will see things that are there
2007-01-07 17:32:17 · answer #3 · answered by egotist61 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this sounds like a philosophical question. I would suggest looking on some of the college websites for philosophy help.
2007-01-07 17:33:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The statement is outrageous and makes no sense what so ever.
2007-01-07 17:30:21 · answer #5 · answered by Kisses 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the difference is between the use of will and may... being that of ALWAYS seeing things that are there and SOMETIMES seeingthings that are not there
2007-01-07 17:30:17 · answer #6 · answered by poppygal13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, that's why no one is answering.
2007-01-07 17:30:30 · answer #7 · answered by glasgow girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are correct
2007-01-07 18:10:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i didn't like it either
2007-01-07 17:30:26 · answer #9 · answered by jacemo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wtf.
I have no idea.
Lost me on 'Did you know'
2007-01-07 17:34:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋