I looked at these sites ages ago and found they were logically flawed.
The 9/11 conspiracy theorists almost always present a series of cumulative facts to prove the official story is wrong. Each item is taken individually and together they build a picture.
The sites like the one you list usually ignore the main conspiracy theory issues and take just a few of the weaker conspiracy arguments. By cherry picking a few items and showing a possible problem, they try to write off the whole series of conspiracy issues.
You can't take the weaker 5% of the conspiracy theory and suggest the other 95% becomes invalid if the 5% does. It's like throwing away a newspaper because one article on page 50 got the date wrong
Also, conspiracy theorists do not offer a Sherlock Holmes type of alternative version. If it was a legal trial and the official story was the prosecution against 19 Muslims and bin Laden, then the conspiracy theories are what a Defence Lawyer would present to destroy the prosecution.
Most people seem to expect the conspiracy theorists to present a fully packaged alternative explanation.
For eample, the Pentagon theory of no Boeing 757 hitting the building, will usually get the response "So where are the people and where did the luggage go then?"
Do you need to present people and luggage if you're suggesting there's no plane?
Most of the sites refuting 9/11 conspiracies are just wrong. I've found some to totally mislead people on certain pieces of evidence, such as previous cases of fires melting Plane fuselage etc.
Others are just abusive and assume calling someone a 'Liberal' or a 'Idiot' is enough to invalidate all their research and facts.
See past the propaganda......
2007-01-07 14:33:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cracker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
your link doesnt go anywhere but i took the time to watch screw loose change a while back , its total bullshit they dont actually cover the main points they just use personal attacks, when you dont even need loose change to realise 9/11 was an inside job . All loosechange do is point out the FACT's (that you can look up yourself without looking at bullshit sites like popular mechanics ) it points out the blatant lies and asks the 100's of questions that the government is not answering and the media are not covering properly or at all .
if you want to stick your head in the sand then i say your a coward , that is your right but you are in for major shocks in the future the denial will not help you in the long run .goodluck with spreading your dis information ,you wont stop people from learning what has and is happening.
2007-01-07 17:37:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Doesn't matter. If someone find faults in 911 'inside job' they'll dismiss it as mainstream media propagonda or simply say its wrong without giving reason.
Look at Pentagon for an example. There were plane parts, black box, landing gears...etc. And only plane's nose was able to penetrate the wall leaving hole about 20ft wide initially. This is because it was massive solid reinforced concrete wall. Planes cannot penetrate this kind of structures.
They claim it is Tomahawk cruise missile that hit Pentagon. The missile contains 1000lbs of explosives and leave a hole only 20ft big on side of wall? Without any bomb crater on the ground?
That's nuts. These missiles can disintegrate bunkers. They don't poke holes on side of buildings they anhilate them.
But again they'll simply point out something else instead and say look at that and dismiss anything that falsify 911 theory to be lies and propaganda.
I recommand you don't worry too much about far out 911 claims. If they can actually get attention of real people out in real public they'll eventually run into someone who'll smash their theories for good. But many will still worship these nutty ideas.
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
2007-01-10 07:02:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What ever it is the powers have remover the web page so no idea.
2007-01-09 02:56:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cannot find the web page, don't know what your talking about. Sorry.
2007-01-07 17:32:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hi T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
your web site does not work
2007-01-07 18:32:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dave 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The requested URL /loosecha... was not found on this server.
:(
2007-01-07 17:31:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr Slug 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i will watch both now and make up my own mind
2007-01-11 06:53:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Fat Controller 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Couldnt find it either.
2007-01-07 17:35:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by jeanimus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHAT WHO ARE YOU.?
2007-01-07 17:30:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋