Hi
I want to know your opionion about the new Queen's singer Paul Rodgers.
If you want to have contact with me to speak of queen's music , please this, is my mail
bohemianrhapqueen@ hotmail.com
Thaks.
2007-01-07 09:19:44 · 12 answers · asked by pamelashine23 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Paul Rodgers is NOT the lead singer of Queen. He is performing with them as they are with him. There shows cover his work with other bands as well as Queen music. If you love real rock-n-roll sounds like a win win situation to me.
2007-01-07 09:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by Eye of Innocence 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paul Rodgers might have a lot of talent but in my opinion their is no one that can replace the voice and charismatic attitude of Freddy Mercury I say Queen and Rodgers perform on VH1's Rock Honors and I was a Little disappointed with Paul's performance compared to the way Freddy did.
2007-01-07 09:24:47 · answer #2 · answered by K T 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul Rodgers is a great singer he does the Queen songs in his own way not a Freddie copy .He is a blues/rockm singer Freddie was an opera/rock singer. Enjoy them both.
2007-01-07 13:23:15 · answer #3 · answered by freebird 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've seen Queen with Freddie Mercury and Paul Rodgers. In my opinion Paul is the better singer, I always felt Freddie had a grating voice, but that's just my opinion.
2007-01-07 09:25:24 · answer #4 · answered by quatt47 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I liked Paul Rodgers with Free, Bad Company and the Firm, but the jury is out on the Queen thing. For me right now he is still very identified with those other groups.
2007-01-07 09:23:18 · answer #5 · answered by Step into the Freezer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Paul Rodgers. If you go to one of the Q+PR concerts, you can tell that he's not trying to be Freddie Mercury. The concerts kind of like Queen, Bad Company, and Free all put together. I respect him, because he's not trying to replace Freddie (which is not possible).
2007-01-08 14:08:42 · answer #6 · answered by radiogaga263 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Queen without Freddie Mercury I'm afraid is NOT Queen. Queen was Freddie & NOT a Brian May ego trip.
2007-01-07 20:43:18 · answer #7 · answered by Jimmydog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
undesirable company became one element yet Rodgers filling in for Freddie became yet another element fullyyt. I consistently seen it like whilst Van Halen tried to interchange Sammy Hagar with Gary Cherone. It worked interior the experience that they had a vocalist. He only could not fill the character void. Yep the yank Idle kidz might desire to have not something to do with a company like Queen. They oughta circulate get George Michael. He greater beneficial than proved himself on the Freddie Tribute tutor from years in the past, whilst he nailed somebody to love. Oh nicely, with any luck they won't circulate the sport tutor direction like that 'supergroup' Rockstar Supernova, which picked its singer ala American Idle. the place are THEY now? lol.
2016-10-30 06:48:16 · answer #8 · answered by uday 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Queen without Freddie Mercury is NOT Queen.
It's another band with the same name and some of the same guys.
2007-01-07 09:25:03 · answer #9 · answered by Captain Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rubbish
2007-01-08 06:25:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋