"In this newer film, the attitude towards women has changed, but it seems that Bond’s hasn’t. He still uses them and makes fun of his power over women, but the women are no longer purely ‘decorative items’; but however, that quality of their existence is still there."
Does this make sense or any suggestions to improve it? I know what I mean but not if it makes sense or not. btw its an essay about the role of women in Bond films (Goldfinger and Die Another Day specifically).
Many Thanks.
2007-01-07 07:32:53 · 8 answers · asked by ukcufs 5 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
In this newer film, the attitude towards womens has changed. Alas it would seem that Bonds hasn't. He still uses them and enjoys the power he thinks he has over them. The women are no longer portrayed as purely decorative characters, however that quality is still clearly an underlying feature.
Personally I think that sounds a little better and makes more sense. Yours is a little confusing. Get someone impartial to read through the answers you get here to help you make a decision.
Good Luck.
2007-01-07 07:42:05 · answer #1 · answered by angie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think I understand that maybe Bond is still a pig, but the women are stronger, more resilient, and almost as capable as he is.
In Die Another Day, who are the Bond Girls? How do they compare with the Bond Girls in Goldfinger? Although Pvssy Galore is pretty awesome, IMO, how do the Girls take care of themselves? Do they seem sexually aware and in charge of their sexuality, or do they let Bond have his way with them? Also, what skills and talents do they have in each movie?
What I would try to add in is that "society's attitude", to compare with Bond's attitude
Good luck:-)
2007-01-07 07:38:55 · answer #2 · answered by Silly me 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about organizing it a bit better:
In this film, the attitude to women has changed: they are no longer just decorative items, but something more.
Bond, however, still uses them and...
2007-01-07 08:19:58 · answer #3 · answered by Mike 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you should allude to the fact that the producers begrudgingly acknowledged the existence of a more modern marketplace where women are seen as discretionary spenders as much as men. James, on the other hand, would not have to be overly concerned with this, since he is on Her Majesties Service!
2007-01-07 07:44:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
instead of saying newer you should say something else- go onto microsoft word and then on to the theasorous (dunno how 2 spell it lol) and it will give u some more suggestions, instead of sayin 'them' in the second line u should say women. and get rid of the second women. when you wrote but however, they mean basically the same thing so as u said but a few words before i would put however if i was you.
hope this helps
2007-01-07 08:44:27 · answer #5 · answered by lil_miss_giggles 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But and however mean the same thing so use one or the other. Lose the semi colon. If you use 'but' then it goes within the sentence, no punctuation needed. If you want to use 'however' it can start a new sentence and should have a comma after it. Actually, use however, you don't want 'but' twice.
2007-01-07 07:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by ammie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm confused, do you mean does the punctuation or the content make sense?
2007-01-07 07:42:03 · answer #7 · answered by bessy_1962 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What are you on,it is bond`s role to use females.
2007-01-07 07:37:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋