We all know the Seahawks would have had 1 minute to drive down to field goal range and have the best clutch kicker in the NFL kick the game winning field goal for them anyways. That wasn't the last play of the game and it wasn't going to be.. either way, the Cowgirls would have lost in devistating fashion so give even though Romo is about as good as Grossman (not saying much), give the guy a break!!
2007-01-07 04:29:21 · 13 answers · asked by artrickwo 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
We all know the Seahawks would have had 1 minute to drive down to field goal range and have the best clutch kicker in the NFL kick the game winning field goal for them anyways. That wasn't the last play of the game and it wasn't going to be.. either way, the Cowgirls would have lost in devistating fashion so even though Romo is about as good as Grossman (not saying much), give the guy a break!!
2007-01-07 04:30:06 · update #1
everyone know Josh Brown is the best clutch kicker in the game. And we all know when the hawks are against the wall is when they are at there best. no doubt in my mind that burleson would have had a decent return and 2 throws later Brown would have been in position for yet another game winning field goal. go cowgirls!!
2007-01-07 06:05:43 · answer #1 · answered by benriedell2002 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The way I look at it is this. Seattle won by 1 point and Dallas had a chance to kick a field goal with around a minute left and Romo fumbled the snap that would have put them up by 2 points.
So yes Seattle might have had a chance but they had no timeouts remaining and need to drive quickly in order to win. Anyone that says Romo did not cost the Cowboys the game is a complete idiot. Had they made it more than likely the cowboys would be playing next week but since I liked the seahawks it worked out well for us. Romo should be this weeks MVP for Seattle!!!!!! THANKS ROMO
2007-01-07 12:39:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I do not think that Romo lost the game for the cowboys. I mean, it could just as easily be on Terry Glen, if they didn't have that saftey then take two points off the board and the ball in dallas's possesion and that game could of turned out way different. i mean, without that safety the game would of been 19-20. but, in the end,Romo played a great game at quarterback, i mean, against that kind of pressure, Seattle really brought it, and i'm excited to see what happens today.. expecially with the Patriots-Jets matchup.
2007-01-07 12:49:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because that appears to be the easiest solution. However any sports game is a collection of plays that lead to an end result.
A game never comes down to one play. Maybe if Terry Glenn didn't fumble. Maybe if the Cowboys didn't allow a 30+yd TD pass to Jeremy Stevens. Maybe this maybe that.
If this was basketball would Michael Jordan have lost the game if he missed a final shot? Of course not.
2007-01-07 12:37:10 · answer #4 · answered by Smootherton 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's Cowboys clown! Parcel's lost the game, he should have known Romo was under too much pressure all game and for the last three weeks. Leaving it to that last play was his mistake. Game could have been put away long time ago.
Peace,
2007-01-07 12:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by George 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well romo did blow it look at the way he was passing the whole game.. at the ground....... brown has won 4 games for us this year and years past he has rarely missed field goals so yes brown is one of the best clutch kickers this year just like rackers was last year.........
2007-01-07 13:42:51 · answer #6 · answered by Mrteabaggens 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he did lose them the game. Seattle would not have scored again. They had one minute no timeouts. Hasselbeck only had a 66 QB rating for the day and two of their top recievers were on the sideline. It would have taken a miracle.
2007-01-07 13:07:42 · answer #7 · answered by lilcurly 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Best clutch kicker? I didnt know the Seahawks had Adam Vinatieri. Who the hell are you kidding?
2007-01-07 12:44:44 · answer #8 · answered by Ballzy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like you said, the hawks would have won anyway, no reason to blame Romo
2007-01-07 12:37:04 · answer #9 · answered by Hans B 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because he did you tool!
The Seagulls would NOT have scored again so give me a break!
2007-01-07 12:53:31 · answer #10 · answered by Scottie Boy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋