i dont get it, bush is basically killing all of our soilders that hes sending to iraq and we didnt find anything like weapons, or anything like that in thier town. So why is he sending 20,000 more people? or atleast i think he is...
2007-01-07 03:36:11 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
You're right. He literally destroyed the entire countries political & economical structure. He's responsible for close to 400,000 civilian deaths there also. I can see him standing in the Oval office with his hands on his hips looking at a map of Iraq smiling and saying to himself, "My work is done."
2007-01-07 03:41:15 · answer #1 · answered by Haven17 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He's doing the right thing, here. I wouldn't mind about 3 more BCT's (Brigade Combat Teams) working in our area around Baghdad. Until we get the militia under control, there can be no peace.
Despite how anyone feels about how we got into this war, we're here and there is only one way out and that's to win.
If it only takes 20,000 more soldiers, let's get it done!
Oh, and by the way, Bush is NOT killing all of our soldiers that he's sending to Iraq. More soldiers come home alive, intact, and productive than not.
2007-01-07 03:42:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
WE SHOULD EXIT ASAP! WE STARTED THIS WAR WE HAVE NO EXCUSE BUT TO LEAVE QUIETLY! I have very unpopular views about this but I believe Saddam was given an unfair trial and was basically murdered. He should have been given a trial at the United Nations or in their custody. The Arabic people are a very unforgiving people and one day i wonder if we are going to regret the policies of the two Bush administrations.
2007-01-07 07:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's better to take them out since they are in no rights to be there in the first place anyway. But it's too late now, Bush got to save his face and make sure the transition will go well. Otherwise, what a shame, sending the troops there only to get things worse. So, final answer, pull out slowly.
2007-01-07 03:43:32 · answer #4 · answered by -Gosal- 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I guess if he thinks more people are needed who am I to argue. But then it was his bright idea to go into this conflict in the first place. If he sends more troops then they should have a clear directive and objective. It should not be open-ended. At some point there needs to be a end. Hopefully before he leaves office.
2007-01-07 03:47:22 · answer #5 · answered by ARM 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"desires to do regardless of he pleases and ignores everybody else's opinion" That attitude would not make you a dictator. What might you do in a distinctive way and why? human beings at here act as though they have all the data approximately each thing, yet I word a real absence of valid titles and occupations which might qualify human beings as valid government to debate the priority. i've got seen what dictators do, and collectively as i don't believe each thing the president does, he's a lot from the tyrannical maniacs that would desire to establish absolute tyranny over this human beings, maximum human beings of that are affirmed members of the different substantial political party.
2016-10-30 06:08:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What he wants and what he'll get are two entirely different things. He's proven by his actions already he's a kill-crazy psychopath who wants to lead the world on the road to a nuclear war and his version of Armageddon. He thinks if he can destroy the world, he'll be able to get his reward in heaven. Little does he realize there's a special corner of hell just waiting for him. Congress will never go along with his wants and desires - people are sick of seeing the body count go higher. BRING THE TROOPS HOME, DUBYA!!!
2007-01-07 03:52:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think he should take him out...because in my opinion...Bush...was the cause of the war...I don't think the plane that hit the towers was hijacked...I think it's all a bunch of b/s...I don't get his deal on sending more troops over...and i know my opinion on the war doesn't change anything...but i don't care...at least i finally got my opinion out in the open...where someone can read it...and...my source is a video called Loose Change...it might actually make someone think differently about our government...and the war
2007-01-07 05:00:58 · answer #8 · answered by Valerie R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i don't think sending any more troops over to iraq will help the cause. the new speaker of the house who is a woman says the president has to justify sending that many more troops to iraq before he gets any funding
2007-01-07 03:45:11 · answer #9 · answered by ken s 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Send more get them trained and get the hell out. The Iraqi's performed raids yesterday detaining 83, the US troops performed back up rolls. I say that is progress!
2007-01-07 03:39:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋