When I was growing up, there was no such thing as a "pant" - that's what dogs did.
2007-01-07 03:33:56 · 5 answers · asked by banjuja58 4 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
it sounds fancy, and stupid lol, thas what clothing lines are best at doing!
2007-01-07 03:36:38 · answer #1 · answered by *sarah* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the clothing stores are retarded..... Nah because my guess would be Pants in plural giving people the idea that they are buying more than one pair of pants instead of one pant(s). They can get sued for false advertising buy offering pants instead of pant would be my guess....
2007-01-07 03:38:21 · answer #2 · answered by McKinney Texas Guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Pants" is the standard word used to describe trousers, but the singular form "pant" is listed in some dictionaries.
I have heard it more by those desribing a "pant leg".
2007-01-07 03:47:41 · answer #3 · answered by True Blue 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They are using correct English and we in the vernacular generally do not.
2007-01-07 05:49:58 · answer #4 · answered by octopussy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok so i think it sort of doesn't matter cuz a person can understand any way. of course it does sound a bit filling if u say pants (i no thats wat i do) its sort of like the whole thing with jeans (jean or jeans?)
2007-01-07 03:40:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋