Is it better to have one superstar, say... Lebron James or two guys who are stars but not superstars, say... Richard Jefferson and Rip Hamilton?
2007-01-07 03:15:01 · 4 answers · asked by #15mwu 5 in Sports ➔ Basketball
It really depends on who that superstar is. If the superstar is Yao Ming who is no peaking into prime years then I'm taking the superstar. Having a monster big man in the NBA is key to winning championships. Just ask Bill Russell, K.Jabbar, Duncan, and Shaq.
2007-01-07 04:52:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need one superstar to be the center of attention, and another superstar is plays a more quiet, diminished role to the point where he is no longer thought of as a superstar. Examples of this are Jordan/pippen, Bird/DJ, Shaq Wade/Kobe/Hardaway, Duncan/parker...
You need 2 great players to compete. Back in the 80's in the Celtics/lakers rivalry, you needed 3/4. But there are more teams now, and the talent is more spread around, so with 2 you can compete.
2007-01-07 15:40:12 · answer #2 · answered by bballfan81 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 but richard hamilton isnt on richard jeffersons team
2007-01-07 12:12:20 · answer #3 · answered by kyle d 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT ALWAYS BETTER TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE GREAT PLAYER.
2007-01-08 17:56:28 · answer #4 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋