Then they would score on 79th minute lol
2007-01-07 04:11:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Benny M 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yeh mate and chelsea would be none league. HAVE YOU HAD YOUR MEDS????
Man Utd would still be where they are whether the game lasted 90, 80 15 or 3 days. Man Utd may have a nack of scoring late goals but we also score plenty of goals during the rest of the match which is the sign of true champions. Just think though if it were 80mins Man Utd would be scoring there late goals 10 mins sooner.
2007-01-07 04:27:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What a stupid statement. It's as if you're blaming Man Utd for their opponents lacking in the last 10 minutes.
2007-01-07 04:34:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sibbs . 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
typical man united jealousy.you just cant admit when were better than you.if your defences could withstand our attack for a full 90 minutes then maybe you would be up the top of the league with the mighty reds.if chelsea didnt have squillions where would they be? i dont see you asking that question
2007-01-07 07:07:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Likely
2007-01-07 03:03:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Emma C 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, it wouldn't. All it would mean is the Man Utd would start their closing effort in the 70th minute instead of the 80th.
2007-01-07 03:05:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
hahaha... and Man Utd will not became Champ league 1999 winner.
2007-01-07 17:17:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Poltak M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they won't because they'll still score in the last 10 minutes of the game.
2007-01-07 03:58:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chinaman 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
No we would just pace our game to it. Doesn't matter if you score in the 1st, 15th, 45th, 60th or 90th....a goal is a goal.
2007-01-07 03:56:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by drawman61 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
no, we just get a lot of goals at the end of a game
2007-01-07 03:20:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋