English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Shouldn't we attack them before they get the chance to do the same to the US.

2007-01-07 02:43:29 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

The US is moving more carrier groups into the waters off Iran, pretty good indicator that Israel will not go it alone. The Us has been perfecting Bunker Busters that carry a Nuclear tip that will penetrate the underground facilities and put a halt to this crazy individuals activity!!

2007-01-07 03:04:27 · answer #1 · answered by SICKO 2 4 · 1 1

Yes, but try and get the news media on the right side. You cannot do it since they want the destruction of America as we know it. If, and I stress IF, Iran and Syria were to attack us, thousand upon thousands dead here in the states and they were to actually get troops on the ground over here, the first ones to be executed would be liberals and they just don't get it. Liberal or not, we ALL need to stand together and stand firm against this wacko islamofacism before it totally destroys us. Remember, the democrat party are willing accomplices to the islamos and they are already here so the enemy is already IN the gates!

2007-01-07 02:48:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No,they shouldn't...There is no reason to attack Iran or Syria...Iran has signed the NNPT,they have allowed the IAEA to inspect their nuclear facilities and the inspectors said that they didn't find any proof that Iran is building a nuclear weapon...nor that they have any intention of attacking any other country...Attacking Iran or Syria would be a very big mistake and I think everyone will regret i if it happens...this woul definitely be the start of WW3...

2007-01-07 02:51:50 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0 1

What purpose will be served by starting a war with Iran and Syria. Do you think any sensible person can think of starting a War with America. USA is fully backing Israel.
Iran has a right to raise its voice against double standard of some countries towards its nuclear policy. It has no intention of making bomb and want to develop nuclear power for peaceful purpose. UN has already imposed limited sanctions.
World environment has completely changed. People want to live in peace. We should always talk about peace and not war. The suggestion made by you does not take into account ground realities. Please also pay your attention to peace efforts made by USA and other countries.

2007-01-07 03:23:33 · answer #4 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0 1

Yes and we should draft all of the Worst Generation - the baby boomers, including President Bush, Laura Bush, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Rush, Hannity, Anne Coulter, etc to fight as infantry on the front lines! Down with the Baby Boomers - Worst Generation Ever! Still sucking off the teat and accomplishments of their parents, The Greatest Generation. A haircut and bath didn't wash the hippy stink off of the boomers! Shamed by their parents and reviled by their children and grandchildren The Worst Generation continues to fail America!

2007-01-07 02:49:39 · answer #5 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 1 1

I think we should attack Canada and Mexico first. Once we have taken over those nations, we wouldnt have to worry about illegal immigrants from the north, and our southern border would be so much smaller we could easily put up a 70 foot high permanent concrete barrier manned by machine gun nests every 25 feet.
Then our country will be strong again.

2007-01-07 02:48:19 · answer #6 · answered by polk2525 4 · 2 0

behind the Israel Offencive of Gaza and Lebanon, u.s. have already got a plan to invade each of the oil riched international places contained in the middle east, merely to thieve the oil and improve itself and make the wealthy to change into undesirable. it truly is clear that oil is clearly endowed source that can not be made by inspite of technologies. US is merely too a lot envy of those countries that possessed the oil; plus their faith. US hate Islam and Muslims, so it truly is the reason the lives of Muslims potential not something to individuals. One reason that could practice that US invaded Iraq for oil is the Deal on the floor between US and Iraq corrupt authorities about oil. verify it nicely. i desire you to do not ignore that even if all Iraqis will die, it potential not something to u.s. because this is not their lives it cares for, it cares for oil. So quickly it reached is call for, lives of Iraqis does not be cared for. it truly is the really reason, have self assurance it or not.

2016-12-01 23:12:28 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I have feeling Israel will do something soon if Iran keeps on acting crazy. The U.S. should also be getting a game plan together.

2007-01-07 02:50:53 · answer #8 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 1 1

YES! Delaying this is like delaying treatment for cancer!

Of course, liberals always believe that thousands of our own people should die first, before taking the necessary action.

2007-01-07 02:45:17 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph C 5 · 1 1

Yes but be ready for China and Russia to join in on their side. That the reason we have not done it.

2007-01-07 02:47:29 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers