Yes, it's okay to have a kid at 35, but the younger you are the better it is and the safer it is. As you get older it becomes harder to conceive, it's like the waiting game and the counting of the right days to have sex and waiting till your next mestrual cycle to say "I'm pregnant" or "not" but there are also risks to having having a baby as you continuously get older, like birth defects.
The healthier you are the better it is. There are people age 40 who has had a healthy baby. Ladies 35 and up should take care of themselves body and mind. Being heathy starts 3 or 4 months before trying to conceive so they should take their prenatal vitamins early.
2007-01-07 02:22:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by cherry-o 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
There exist a safe age for become pregnant, this age is between 25 and 35. There are few health problems in this period of time. First of all you have to check your state of health, eat well and proper certain aliments that will enhace your protein and aminoacid levels. Eat fruits and juices, fat free food, meat or lactic products, grains and drink pure water. Make excercise and when you think to be ready for this maternity labor, first check your economical possibilities and visit your gynaecologist, obiously if you are a woman. If you are the man love her and assit her in this beautiful process of life.
2007-01-08 00:21:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bhai Haripurakh S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Women can have children as long as they are still fertile. Yes, there is an increased risk as a women passes 40, of the child being born with downs syndrome, about 1/100 chance. But plenty of women in their early to mid 40's are having perfectly healthy babies. About 20% of all babies are now born to women over 35. HTH : )
2007-01-07 11:32:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is not an age limit to the safety of pregnancy. Yes, the older you are, especially after 35, it is harder to conceive, and there are risks as far as your egg quality, however, you can be 20 and have issues that can be problematic, and you can be 40, and have a beautiful baby. Everyone is different.
2007-01-07 17:16:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ne thankful you werent living in the old ages when women as old as 600 had kids LOL can you imagine?
At 67, Romanian becomes oldest woman ever to give birth
AFP | January 16, 2005
BUCHAREST - A 67-year-old Romanian became the oldest woman ever known to have given birth, although one of her twin girls died shortly afterwards, Bucharest's Giulesti Hospital told a TV station.
Adriana Iliescu, a retired university professor, had undergone fertility treatment for nine years before succeeding in becoming pregnant.
Realitatea TV said she had given birth to twin girls, one of whom had died almost immediately. The surviving infant, which weighed 1.4 kilogram (three pounds), was in good health, the TV channel said.
The previous record was held by an Italian woman who gave birth to a baby boy at the age of 62. Doctors had implanted the egg of a young Italian woman which had been fertlized by her husband's sperm.
Doctors who handled the Iliescu pregnancy maintained total secrecy about the case, which became known to the Romanian public only from one exclusive interview Iliescu gave on the Realitatea television channel last month.
In the appearance, filmed in a hospital whose identity and location were not divulged, the retired professor said she had "not been able to resign myself to not having a child."
"I always dreamt of being a mother, and now I'm experiencing the happiest time of my life, waiting to bring my twin daughters into the world," the graying academic said with visible emotion.
Iliescu said she did not feel the effect of her relatively advanced years.
The case has sparked widespread controversy.
"She will be too old to see her children grow up," lamented the newspaper Cotidianul ahead of the birth, questioning the ethics of doctors who consented to her being artificially inseminated.
But the Church has adopted a conciliatory position.
"The Bible preaches love and procreation at whatever age," said the press office of Patriarch Bogdan Teleanu, head of the Romanian Orthodox Church.
Lucia Cornea, a staff member of Romania's centre for assisted reproduction, does not agree: "It's a scandal," she said.
Gheorghe Borcean, head of the Romanian medical profession's ethics committee, meanwhile criticised the mystery that shrouded the case.
"A case of such prominence should require academic debates and not just one single television report," he complained.
He said the Iliescu experiment had been "very risky both for the mother and for the children."
"Furthermore the quality of the sperm used for conception is doubtful," he warned.
A new Romanian law on assisted reproduction will come into effect in the country on January 1, 2007, the date on which Romania hopes to join the European Union ( news -web sites ), Cornea says.
"This law, in line with European norms, is expected to include an age limit of around 50 years of age for Romanian women seeking artificial insemination," she notes.
i would say to be really safe no later than 40
2007-01-07 10:17:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by private n 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
With modern medicine, women are now going to 40, but as a rule, the younger the safer.
2007-01-07 10:15:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
For first children 30 is safe.
and for second children 35 is safe.
2007-01-08 01:37:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Biswadip D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
from 18 to 45 is safe if you are healthy and sexually active
2007-01-07 10:37:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Harinder S. Johal 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
35 okay if you're in good health
2007-01-07 10:17:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Phrosty 4
·
1⤊
0⤋