English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

the one who loves silently without askiin os beter than the first one

2007-01-07 01:23:34 · answer #1 · answered by srinu710 4 · 0 0

I've rated your Question as Good because I was looking everywhere to find a good question to answer so here it is

Love of both of them is good and equally respectful the difference lies in their personality

(1) Who wants his love at any cost is somewhere insecure within himself, do not want to loose anything and is possibly going through this first or second time means the experience of this kind is new and is considered brave and aggressive, can't see himself loosing, Never weeps, can make other weep

(2) Who silently loves without asking much is one who has seen very very tough times in life may be lots of betrayels or bad experiences. See, bad experience leave us with lessons, patience and a respect for the Supreme Will (will of God), therefore he surrenders but loves silently and hides his/her tears

Love in both the cases is equally respectfull because Love is Love.

2007-01-07 09:35:07 · answer #2 · answered by Sunlight 3 · 1 0

one who silently love without asking muc?

2007-01-07 09:39:39 · answer #3 · answered by pratik m 1 · 0 0

The second one is definetely the best. In this world if you ask anything..demand anything..by force ..you dont get anything. Silent love is better as you are turning to God for the results.

2007-01-09 04:06:37 · answer #4 · answered by Saheli 2 · 0 0

Love in both ways are lovely but I feel the silent love is more effective

2007-01-07 09:32:28 · answer #5 · answered by Shirazi 1 · 0 1

silent love.... if someone wants their love at any cost then they dont really care about the other person... whereas someone with a silent love is so devoted they will let another person be happy even if it hurts them

2007-01-07 09:24:24 · answer #6 · answered by natalia121 4 · 1 0

Do you have any doubt that the second one is infinitely better than the first? Selfishness has no place in real love. The first one is precisely that.

2007-01-07 10:46:30 · answer #7 · answered by Modest 6 · 1 0

I don't Know better than you. Because the defination of love for all is not same. And both are trying to love better in their won way.

2007-01-07 09:31:54 · answer #8 · answered by Alexius T 2 · 0 1

i think the second one. because the first one could be obessesion as well and u don't get anything from that. people just end up fighting with each other.whereas in second one u got someone who just love u from depth of his/her heart. and they love u ur whole life doesn't if u get them or not.

2007-01-10 08:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by stranger 4 · 0 0

One who makes the other to understand the deepness of his or her love and one who understands the opposite person's love. those are the Best

2007-01-07 09:30:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers