2007-01-07 00:41:38 · 5 answers · asked by Patrick s 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I'd want to know what changes this new guy had in mind, of course, but I'd prefer the dedicated newcomer to the machine politician, certainly. That's some of why I am a Libertarian.
2007-01-07 00:46:33 · answer #1 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the person with no political background was able to run, & I knew what his stance was on the issues.{Fisical Responsibility, Education, Smaller Government, Corperate Welfare, Immagration?} Oh yah I would definetly look at an independent with no political background. I think thats what we need in both houses, & the white house.
2007-01-07 03:20:02 · answer #2 · answered by Fab 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I wouldn't vote for Hillary or Obama. The American voting ballot needs a block that says "None Of the Above". If that block is the predominately checked block, the parties have to find another candidate. Why do we have to settle?
2007-01-07 00:58:40 · answer #3 · answered by iplaybass1956 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I absolutely agree with the previous answer of having a check box for none of the above. At this point in time there is not a canidate on either side of the isle worth listening too.
2007-01-07 01:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by what? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never vote for someone with no experience and even worse a passion for change. Change is not necessarily good. Jimmy Carter ran on change and look what happened
2007-01-07 00:49:42 · answer #5 · answered by goodtimesgladly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋