English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I cant stand these people. Cant they get a real photography job? This whole concept of celebrity is bad enough as its not really the fault of the people regarded as celebrity but all these 'Hello' and'ok' magazines. Just leave these people to their lives.

2007-01-07 00:33:44 · 19 answers · asked by jj26 5 in News & Events Media & Journalism

19 answers

These so called Famous people want to use the paparazzi when THEY want and cant stand the heat when things go wrong. Personally I dont want to know anything about those so called celebs and their pitiful lives

2007-01-07 01:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it's not the paparazzi that should leave any so called celebrities alone. I believe, us the general public, could put an end to this. If everybody agreed to boycott these newspapers that contain photos and stories then soon there would be no need for these photographers so they'd lose their jobs. It's all about supply and demand. Whilst people are buying the magazines etc. there's always gonna be a need for these leeches (who are just trying to earn money like you or me). Having said that, it must be difficult for those people like Kate Middleton, who never asked for it, never wanted to be in the limelight, she's just a girlfriend of a very well-known personality (who also didn't ask to be born). As for those other celebrities that are always causing outrage....well, they do deserve a bit of harrassment but still, it is not nice.

2007-01-07 00:46:45 · answer #2 · answered by Luvfactory 5 · 1 0

It amazes me that the paparazzi haven't learnt from the death of HRH Prince William's mother, Princess Diana. She was hounded by these so called photographers, now look where she is! I can see the same thing happening to William's Girlfriend or even William himself!

Time for a general boycott of the papers/magazines that will publish those pictures.

2007-01-07 01:07:02 · answer #3 · answered by tunisianboy46 5 · 0 0

I have always viewed there kind of work as being associated with a DOG. and the mischief makers for (The Editor)and so when looking behind the scene( the editor) is the puppeteer pulling the sleigh of dog much like the Alaskan frontier where the air is cold and so the heart of the EDITOR lives there.

2007-01-07 01:36:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Too many people buy OK and Hello magazine for the happy snappers to worry about consequence. Having said that, modern royals will have to accept that their lives can't be as normal as all that, perhaps they need to identify the difference between 'royal' and 'celebrity'.

2007-01-07 05:32:08 · answer #5 · answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5 · 0 0

I don't agree actually.
Everyone knows paparazzis will never go away, and it is a down side of being famous, and/or dating/hanging out with celebrity.
Every upside has a down, and every day has a night. Fact of life.

2007-01-07 01:16:56 · answer #6 · answered by Lee 1 · 0 0

They should leave Prince William's girlfriend alone. But there is a profit motive involved.
As long as it sells papers/mags, they will hound his girlfriend and any other celebrity whether we find it morally reprehensible or not.

2007-01-07 00:59:55 · answer #7 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 0 0

Until the average thicko stops buying the newspaper and magazines these articles appear in then it will continue. Come on? we know your out there, why is your life so naff that you have to take interest in others?

2007-01-07 06:26:23 · answer #8 · answered by simon m 4 · 1 0

Unfortunately there are too many people who read the TRIPE these pictures are published in. This includes ALL the newspapers. The SCUM paps. are after one thing only. MONEY. Take their circulation away and they will die out.
They will destroy that poor girls life like they hounded Diana.

xxB

2007-01-07 00:38:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I Agree

2007-01-07 00:35:05 · answer #10 · answered by ltjn4 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers