She is already in bed (figure of speech) with Hugo Chavez, What’s to stop her from (if she hasn’t already done so) signing up with Castro?
How can she even pretend to speak for Americans when she blatantly unites herself wit Anti-American groups?
That’s my personal opinion.
What's yours?
2007-01-06
23:33:12
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Stone K
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I am well aware that many Americans agree with her point of view, but she claims to speak for all Americans, and that is blatantly false.
I never claimed she could not travel out side the country to share her views, I was asking if her and her obvious anti-American sentiments would be better off left in Cuba.
2007-01-06
23:50:26 ·
update #1
Maybe we could pay the Cubans to keep her.
2007-01-07 00:31:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
PATRIOT answered this question the best as she is a traitor and a disgrace. I thank all men and women who served in the military. Sheehan didn't just start this protesting after her son's death as she was an activist way before that. She used his death to put her self into the spotlight. In reality her son would have disagreed with her views and been ashamed of her. Sheehan is a typical Berkely protester that does not like America and it's core values always looking at America as bad. I hope she goes to Cuba and never comes back and she can take all the loony tunes that agree with her with her!
2007-01-07 00:47:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I feel bad for her loss, but she has become a complete comedy show and a puppet for the Democratic Party. I think she should come back for pure comedic reasons. When is her trip to North Korea?
2007-01-07 16:44:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The woman definately has some mental issues.She has given up her husband and other children for her political beliefs.Evidence she cannot think rationally.One step away from mental institution maybe.Maybe she will crawl in bed with Fidel,shes a pretty desperate woman right now.
edited:in response to schmittys answ.First he was not a child,he was an adult that volunteered twice go enlist in the military and wanted to go to Iraq his last time as he had requested.He opted to go the 2nd time to Iraq.And hate to disappoint you but no most of america is not mentally unstable and support her.
Andy is a frenchy,of course he supports anyone that opposes the united states.France has their hands full with their own punk terrorists,clean up your own yard before you look in someone elses there frenchy.
2007-01-06 23:36:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by jnwmom 4
·
5⤊
3⤋
Why are all you cons so disturbed by a center elderly female that lost her son, and has actual no skill to do something? she will be able to't be a traitor or commit treason because she has no get entry to to categorised fabric.
2016-12-01 23:06:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fox News says NO!!! They need her as the poster child for whacked Democrats.
2007-01-06 23:58:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Isabel F 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
She is going as political theater. Nothing wrong with that. The US Government always has the propaganda advantage; why shouldn't she use whatever means she has to get her point across.
The Iraq war is an international crime. But because the USG has the means to suppress much dissent it got away with it in the early months; and by that time it was too late to do anything.
Cuba is an insignificant backwater. But the US is scarcely innocent of using evil foreign dictators for their own purposes. Hey, they cozied up to Saddam for years and years. And Pinochet and lots of other murderers, human rights violators warmongers, fascists . . . the enemy of America's enemy has always been its friend . . . as long as it was expedient. And that includes Afghan drug lords today.
"PATRIOT" below is astonishing in his un- and anti-constitutional rant, equating dissent with treason. How come s/he doesn't advocate re-enactment of the Sedition Acts?
The Bush Administration went into Iraq to steal its oil for its cronies; the way it has already emptied the Treasury of the Clinton surplus and mortgaged the future of every American child born and to be born for decades to come . . . to the Chinese, to make stuff. (And Ross Perot thought that US jobs would be sucked down to Mexico? They were sucked over to China, which will soon OWN America. The remaining US jobs are either so reserved for insiders ($210 million in salary and perks, for example) or so backbreaking and poorly paid that only immigrants will do them.)
2007-01-06 23:39:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
As long as the media puts her in the spotlight, she will continue to shine. She has very little support, so she must do radical things to stay in the news. It would be nice if someone would investigate where she is getting her financial support from. I smell George Soros in this somehow.
2007-01-06 23:36:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by meathead 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
You are confusing anti-Bush with anti-American, not the same thing. Her son died for her right to speak out against the war monger. Being anti-Bush is being pro-American
2007-01-06 23:48:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by industrialconfusion 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
The poor woman is mentally ill....her son would be ashamed of her, my condolences on her loss however what she is doing is treason and the fact is her son died trying to promote pace and stability in regions where she would be executed for her behavior! as a vet I appreciate her sons sacrifice.
2007-01-06 23:39:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋