At CERN (this year) the search for the last remaining particle in underway. If discovered or when discovered I should say, then how the Universe was created will be explained. Does this mean that first Nature then Religion and finally Science is true?
2007-01-06 22:57:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
No it will prove nothing I agree with acid_zebr... although I do believe in God, and I don't believe anyone will ever be able to prove it either way to non believes, I have seen lots which give me no choice but to believe in God, but no matter what evidence you come up a non believer would not accept it, I suppose that works both ways as well, but science will never be able to prove that God does not exist, st because he does, and 2nd because God is part of Science, the bible is a story, the truth is to keep a long story short God, and Science go together hand in hand
2007-01-07 09:32:16 · answer #1 · answered by ringo711 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would not fairly. There are theories with regards to the commencing up of the universe that don't extraordinarily _require_ God to get issues started, yet that could be a a strategies cry from proving God would not exist. The time era "God Particle" is an unlucky determination of words, because of the fact it implies something that purely isn't there. As I comprehend it at that is maximum hardship-unfastened, the Higgs boson might clarify why some debris have mass, mutually as others do not. there is what's talked approximately as the "properly-known variety" of particle physics. each and all of the debris expected by technique of the SM were before discovered, apart from the HB. If the HB isn't discovered, the the SM should be remodeled, and an excellent variety of what we expect of all of us be attentive to approximately sub-atomic debris is going out the window. If has been discovered, it might desire to head a protracted way in the direction of explaining how the 4 common forces (gravity, electromagnetism, and the vulnerable and robust nuclear forces) went from being unified (we expect of) on the tiniest fraction of a 2d after the universe began, to being the 4 forces all of us be attentive to right away.
2016-12-15 17:52:57 · answer #2 · answered by andie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While the discovery of Higgs Boson, if made (it was first theorized back in the 60's and no DIRECT evidence of it has been made yet), will help since it should be able to unite the weak force and electromatic force, it is still a long way from discovering how the universe was created.
There is still no way of combining gravity with the other forces, and the graviton has never detected, only theorized about.
I don't see how you can say that Higgs Boson is the last remaining particle.
2007-01-07 00:38:39 · answer #3 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I also asked a question on here about higgs boson because I had had a tour of CERN just as the Higgs boson was postulated, while visiting my brother who actually lives just down the road in Geneva.
We discussed if it's possible that these new fields of force are actually fields and not really particles in any normal sense of the word being closer to fundamental energy much as string theory had been recently... .
They may indeed explain much if they are as I asked before linked to such as dark energy.
But as for nature, religion and science with god not in equation well
zzzzzzz
2007-01-06 23:13:12 · answer #4 · answered by farshadowman 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't really understand the last part of the question 'nature then religion and finally Science is true?'
Which religion? It is true that some scientist, like Einstein and Hawking, have used the word 'God' as a metaphor for the underpining mechanisms of the observable universe, but that is not religion is the popular sense. Religion is faith based and incompatible with the scientific method!
2007-01-06 23:06:12 · answer #5 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let's say you built something - a radio for instance. Then i come along later, take it apart and figure out how you made it. That doesn't alter the fact that you built it. Just because we can study our environment and figure out a little of what has happened doesn't prove or disprove the existance of a God. The people that believe that there is no God just because we can take what he has done, analyze it and speculate about it's origin generally can't accept the fact that we are not the most powerful beings around.
2007-01-06 23:08:02 · answer #6 · answered by Rocking J in Oklahoma 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
See religion is there from so many years now. It tells us science, but in belief's way. Science shows proofs and religion doesnt that's all. It tells us about this universe and all, but in a complicated style. Science is showing us in an easy method and the method which, is showing evidence as well.
2007-01-06 23:10:04 · answer #7 · answered by mansi 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a complete atheist and even I think that discovering this 'last particle' (I doubt it will be the last) will not conclusively prove or disprove the existence of god.
2007-01-06 22:59:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
At that point we understand the nature of the early universe, but not where it came from. It is a step in the right direction.
2007-01-06 23:06:12 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science rains supreme.
2007-01-06 23:45:32 · answer #10 · answered by CLIVE C 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋