Lina Medina (born September 27, 1933 in Paurange, Peru) gave birth at the age of 5 years, 7 months and 21 days and is the youngest confirmed mother in medical history.
2007-01-06 21:33:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by steffers4979 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
In the hospital where I work there was a 9 year old girl who had been raped but she didn't want to kill the baby. It was delivered by C-section because she was to small to give natural birth. That's the youngest I have seen.
2007-01-07 05:37:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by greylady 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
In one of my Psychology books in college it wa listed as 5. It was a girl from some Island country, can't remember, but she had a disorder in which you hormones kick in too early and so she was able to get pregnant. Other than that once you get your period you can have a baby so like I'm sure 12 year olds have had babies.
2007-01-07 05:33:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by fifimsp1 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lina Medina was 5 yr old. In may 1939.
2007-01-07 05:37:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Linda medina 5yrs 7months and 21 days. The smallest confirmed
2007-01-07 05:58:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by rohan 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
I remember seeing a special on the discovery channel years back... where a SIX year old gave birth! Thats the youngedt I know.
2007-01-07 05:32:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Angel 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
The youngest mother on record was a five-year-old Peruvian girl.
Her name was Lina Medina, a Peruvian girl from the Andean village of Ticrapo who made medical history when she gave birth to a boy by caesarean section in May 1939 at the age of five years, seven months and 21 days. Lina's parents initially thought their daughter had a large abdominal tumor, but after they took her to a hospital in the town of Pisco physicians confirmed that her abdominal swelling was due to pregnancy. Lina was eventually transferred to a hospital in Lima, where she delivered a six-pound baby boy by Cesarean section on 14 May 1939 (coincidentally the date on which Mother's Day was celebrated that year). Lina's father was temporarily jailed on suspicion of incest, but he was released for a lack of evidence and authorities were never able to determine who fathered Lina's child.
Lina's incredible story was documented in contemporaneous reports by Edmundo Escomel, one of Peru's preeminent physician-researchers of the period and a laureate of the prestigious French Academy of Sciences. Escomel's first correspondence to the editors of La Presse Medicale1 (which is undated but appeared in the 13 May 1939 issue) noted that Lina first came to the attention of Dr. Gérado Lozada, chief physician of the Hospital of Pisco, when she appeared at that hospital in early April 1939 for evaluation of what was assumed to be a massive abdominal tumor.
It soon became obvious to the stunned Lozada, however, that the little girl was pregnant. A medical history revealed that she had been having regular periods since age 3, but that she had stopped menstruating for the past 7½ months. Additionally, she had fully developed breasts. Further examination revealed a fetal heartbeat, and an X-ray confirmed the pregnancy. Escomel stated that Lozada had submitted a report about the case to the Academy of Medicine in Lima.
Escomel's announcement2 (dated 20 May 1939) that Lina had delivered a baby boy (on 14 May) appeared in the 31 May issue of La Presse Medicale. In addition to amending the age at which Lina began menstruating (to an incredible 8 months), Escomel submitted a photograph of the gravid 5½-year-old:
At the end of his piece Escomel noted with some sadness that no one had yet discovered the identity of the father since Lina "couldn't give precise responses." He also stressed the importance of getting adequate care for the little girl.
Escomel's final report3 was published in the 19 December 1939 issue of La Presse Medicale. He commented on a biopsy of one of Lina's ovaries performed on a sample removed at the time of the Cesarean section and provided photomicrographs of the stained tissue sections. In the end, pathologists pronounced Lina to have the ovaries of a fully mature woman. Escomel posited that the reason behind her precocious fertility could not lie in the ovaries themselves but must have stemmed from an extraordinary hormonal disorder of pituitary origin. (As a point of comparison, the average age of first menstruation in the U.S. is 12½.)
Dr. De Lee cited the case of a Russian girl who became a mother at the age of 6½. According to the physician who reported the case in a German medical journal, Dr. De Lee said, the mother had the physical development of a girl 10 or 12 years old.5
Six months later, the New York Times reported that an American public health official had also verified Lina's remarkable story:
While in Lima Dr. [S.L. Christian, assistant surgeon general of the U.S. Public Health Service] examined Lina Medina, the Indian child-mother whose baby was born last May when the mother was about 5 years old. He said that although there was some confusion as to whether the mother was 5 or 6, there was no doubt of the authenticity of the case, which he described as the most amazing thing in his career as a physician.6
The following year the New York Times reported that a trip was being organized so Lina could be "brought to the United States within a month for examination by a five-man medical commission." Plans called for the little mother, the baby boy, and the girl's parents to travel to Chicago, but there was no follow-up indicating that the Medina family ever made the journey to the U.S.7 In 1941, two years after Lina give birth, the New York Times published an account of an American psychologist who had examined Lina while visiting South America:
2007-01-07 05:33:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Albertan 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
5. and i think she is still alive
2007-01-07 07:56:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by orlyandsa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋