From a "sanctity of life" perspective, are antibiotics unethical towards bacteria?

Answer 1

lol lol hee hee You are cool!

Answer 2

Hah, very interesting situation. I think that it depends on the person really, suppose for example a person who would develop drugs for benign bacteria to have longer lives, in the bacteria's perspective, this person should be saved.

But that's as absurd as it sounds. The person's life is in danger because bacteria are attempting to kill him, reason for which he has an immune system, though in this case it's not enough. Taking that into consideration I don't think it would be unethical.

Furthermore, statistically speaking, it shouldn't be unethical even if you consider killing bacteria to be equal to killing humans. In the course of the bacteria colony living within the patient's body, entire generations come and go, all in a constant war with the immune system. The seemingly large number of bacteria that live there are actually close to nothing relative to the amount of bacteria that exist outside. The amount of bacteria that will be killed using antibiotics will stop a long war and save a man's life. The ongoing killing of both bacteria and immune cells will finally end. It would be similar to a justified use of a nuclear weapon. The bacteria had no right to go there, the body's population needed to defend themselves. And last but not least, the death of one man in six billion is more relevant the death of a few million bacteria in a number much larger than six billion. The percentage of bacteria killed are actually not that significant compared to the percentage of humans that would die, if only one man died.

In the end, I think using antibiotics is a necessary evil, a quick route to end a war that puts a lot of single-celled organisms in harm's way.

Answer 3

The "sanctity of life" perspective is from a human perspective so it pertains to the human life. So assuming antibiotics are given to save the human life then it is not unethical.

If viewed from the baterial perspective, then of course antibiotics would be unethical as it is a form of murder initiated by humans.

Answer 4

Oh, but human life is so much more important than anything else because we are created in God's image. At least I believe that is the argument. Billions of people out there, billions of cockroaches too, all of us are alive, live, breathe, exist, have purpose in our lives. But only the human's life is golden, precious, to be preserved no matter what. Because humans are ever so much more important than anyone or anything else on this earth. Especially white humans living in America.

No one cries when a cockroach dies. No one calls it a miracle when a rat conceives baby rats. No one calls it a tragedy when a seedling is pulled up before it becomes a tree.

And certainly, as you pointed out, antibiotics definitely are made to kill bacteria therefore they threaten the sanctity of the bacteria's right to life.

Answer 5

The first responsible you have is to perserve the body/temple under any and all circumstances or situations even if means transforming bacteria or an entity which wishes to destroy you.

Answer 6

More of a food chain thing - like if a tiger is attacking and you have penicillan to alter ist DNA to resist the urge to fight off it's own bacteria.

Answer 7

funny but no, bacteria are too small. if it were unetical to kill bacteria you would have to get a lot of opperations like for example to remove the hydro cloric acid from your stomach.
but antibiotics might be unetical towards humans as they harm them.

Answer 8

Anti-biotics are not good because they allow the bacteria to evolve into super bugs.

Answer 9

it truly is all on your mentality about it. even as real that you may not value ladies too a lot, do not devalue them. basically be sure you often value your self above them. it really is what human beings advise even as they say you're putting ladies on a pedestal-- that you're putting them above your self. extremely, ladies are not any larger than you and they could be valued basically as a lot as any adult men you've not met. That stated, even as courting assorted ladies can help you you smash out of the 'oneitis', it received't inevitably remedy the basis of the concern. My advice: supply up questioning about courting ladies for awhile and concentrate on you, your pastimes, your interests. Do issues that make you experience helpful to your self. in case you do not have value to your self, how are you going to have value for others? it really is now to not say supply up interacting with ladies, yet supply up courting them. take care of the girls folk round you want adult men you comprehend. do not supply them any more effective or a lot less interest. Your self belief and nonchalance will be appealing to them! Then, once you're feeling satisfied about your self (and also you've outfitted up your circle of associates consisting of ladies) go carry close out with them, meet their associates, and date whoever you pick. Addendum: I fairly a lot forgot. the reason it hurts so undesirable to split with someone is because of the pedestal ingredient. once you positioned someone on a pedestal you also oftentimes will supply them administration over your value. this isn't healthful. you may no longer positioned your self-worth on the line for a lady. because of this I say artwork on your self. in case you construct your human being value and believe you've value, then it will take so a lot more effective than a lady you're courting to knock it down. yet, in case you date assorted women folk and proceed to grant them administration over your value, it will damage even more effective.

Answer 10

Yes.

Answer 11

Limit of puritanism