apart from the obvious turbo, rear brakes , bonnet scoops and the hill start aid on the sport
2007-01-06 20:51:06 · 12 answers · asked by steve r 2 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Subaru
to Linda j...what stupid ironing board
2007-01-10 22:32:05 · update #1
i had a impreza wrx turbo.........it was fast........ but it also blew the engine at 40,000.miles.......lots lots of problems i bought the car when it was 1 year old if you are going to purchase acar like that need to be new so noone has messed with the motor and added after market which can void your warranty.......... oh_hell
2007-01-06 20:56:37 · answer #1 · answered by oh_hell_imagine_that 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The interior is of lower spec in the sport. turbos have nice bucket style seats. other than the engine, bonnet and brake set up, i cant see any differences. The GL impreza stands out as a very standard looking car. When i first saw one i thought it was a proton or something similar.
2007-01-09 06:56:37 · answer #2 · answered by craigs @ peugeot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 2.0 Sport is a slightly specc'ed 4WD small saloon car and the turbo is a pocket rocket that will i) get you speeding tickets ii) cost a fortune in repairs if you don't look after it and iii) if bought 2nd hand from a boy racer will already be 90% trashed.
2007-01-06 21:17:17 · answer #3 · answered by CJ 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
impreza sport has no turbo ,, its normally aspirated , a lot slower therefor, cheaper to run & insure and more of a shopping car ,, i got a 2 litre tubo and its awsome ,, and unlike some people who have a problem with turbo owners , i am a very responsible driver
2007-01-07 00:53:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Different interior, lower spec,130 bhp for the sport. My brother had a sport that we slowly converted to sti spec. The mechanical stuff was pretty simple, the electrics were a nightmare.
Oh and the sport can't keep up with a nova gte. :@)
2007-01-07 00:32:45 · answer #5 · answered by jimmy t 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both are built on the same line in Japan and both have the same chassis. The engine and horsepower is more in the turbo 230/2.5 litre in the turbo. The sport is 160/2 litre
http://www.subaru.co.uk/IMGGB/WWW/subaru_co_uk.nsf/LiveByRef/AMAN-65QC24?OpenDocument
http://www.subaru.co.uk/IMGGB/WWW/subaru_co_uk.nsf/LiveByRef/QEDA-6C8K42?OpenDocument
2007-01-12 04:13:19 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the version between have and had is easy to work out in case you in consumer-friendly words dig deep adequate into the interior meanings. Have is modern annoying as in you've some thing. Had is in previous annoying as in you had some thing yet than ever so abruptly you let it rapidly slip away.
2016-12-28 07:16:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sports are a sensible car, the turbo are driven hard by people who think they are good at driving, but usually are not
2007-01-06 22:16:20 · answer #8 · answered by richard n 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
pretty much just power. thats just like the Corvette Coupe and Z06. the Z06 will blow away the WRX ANY day of the week but thats beside the point. the difference is power. thats about it. oh and the looks.
2007-01-10 12:40:11 · answer #9 · answered by Ryan T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont know, but my 2006wrx turbo is a great car, recommend it to anyone
2007-01-11 03:33:09 · answer #10 · answered by Juan Kassoff 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋