should we be able to choose where our taxes go?

Question

as in what programs we want to fund?

Answer 1

NO, this is what liberals want to do.

Conservatives want to abolish most taxes to you can spend your own money.

27 Undeniable Truths:

All of these truths are of the same importance.
1. There is a distinct singular American culture - rugged individualism and self-reliance - which made America great.
2. The vast majority of the rich in this country did not inherit their wealth; they earned it. They are the country's achievers, producers, and job creators.
3. No nation has ever taxed itself into prosperity.
4. Evidence refutes liberalism.
5. There is no such thing as a New Democrat.
7. Character matters; leadership descends from character.
6. Ronald Reagan was the greatest president of the twentieth century.
7. The 1980s was not a decade of greed but a decade of prosperity; it was the longest period of peacetime growth in American history.
8. Abstinence prevents sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy -every time it's tried.
9. Poverty is not the root ("rut") cause of crime.
10. There's a simple way to solve the crime problem: obey the law; punish those who do not.
11. If you commit a crime, you are guilty.
12. Women should not be allowed on juries where the accused is a stud.
13. The way to improve our schools is not more money, but the reintroduction of moral and spiritual values, as well as the four "R's": reading, 'riting, 'rithmatic, and Rush.
14. There is a God.
15. There is something wrong when critics say the problem with America is too much religion.
16. Morality is not defined by individual choice.
17. The only way liberals win national elections is by pretending they're not liberals.
18. Feminism was established as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.
19. Follow the money. When somebody says, "It's not the money," it's always the money.
20. Liberals attempt through judicial activism what they cannot win at the ballot box.
21. Using federal dollars as a measure, our cities have not been neglected, but poisoned with welfare dependency funds.
22. Progress is not striving for economic justice or fairness, but economic growth.
23. Liberals measure compassion by how many people are given welfare. Conservatives measure compassion by how many people no longer need it.
24. Compassion is no substitute for justice.
25. The culture war is between the winners and those who think they're losers who want to become winners. The losers think the only way they can become winners is by banding together all the losers and then empowering a leader of the losers to make things right for them.
26. The Los Angeles riots were not caused by the Rodney King verdict. The Los Angeles riots were caused by rioters.
27. You could afford your house without your government - if it weren't for your government.

Answer 2

No, because if we were able to, the conservatives would refuse to fund liberal programs and the liberals would refuse to fund the conservative programs, leading to only half of the federal budget each year regardless of who was in power. Also, unpopular but necessary programs would never be funded and could cause societal, economic, or political crashes if the people could withhold their money from certain programs and put it into others. Also some programs might end up overfunded while some were underfunded.

Answer 3

It would not be achieveable. Tax money would desire to be applied, no longer in uncomplicated terms apportioned. appreciably changing and volatile investment for reasons, as could inherently effect from the variety of equipment, could effect in no longer something getting completed. it may additionally a great deal boost the area that media retailers have on investment, because of the fact that any standard, nonetheless factually incorrect or politically biased, tale can swing tax money far flung from an argument that truly needs addressing, or in the direction of pointless reasons. What if too, as an occasion, you wanted to alter your ideas midway throughout the 300 and sixty 5 days or when you already sent on your varieties?

Answer 4

You do. By chosing the public officials who allocate the budget on behalf of society as a whole.
If you don't like how it's being spent, then change the administration. Anything else would be both costly and clumsy to administer and would give too much of a say to the vocal and selfish few.

Answer 5

NO!

How many people would want their money go: to helping drug addicts rehabilitate; to building better sewerage works in New York (you can just pump into the ocean and save money); to building more or better prisons (just put more in each prison cell); to reducing noise pollution around airports (don't live there, doesn't effect me so why should I pay for it) etc.

Unpopular causes would get no money and popular causes would get it all.

Some 'third party' needs to make the choices so that all sections and choices of expenditure get considered.

Answer 6

Sure.

As one of America's richest taxpayers, I want my taxes to go to fund my son's private school, and towards military intervention overseas to make sure my oil-heavy stock portfolio goes up.

Cheers!

Answer 7

Yes I do, we give away so much of our tax dollars to other countries who don't deserve it. I think it is our politicians who aren't smart enough. They only do things that will look good for themselves on paper. I think it is the politicians of this world who are to blame for all the problems each country has. They should be the one's fighting our wars for us, we pay them enough to do so, much much more than our military men get.

Answer 8

I say . . .

YES !!!!

The government can come up with their ideas and proposals and us taxpayers can decide which ones to fund and how much.

Answer 9

Absolutely not...the average person isn't smart enough to decide such things.

Answer 10

YA!!! we SHOULD! cause i want my taxes to go BACK into MY bank account!