English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

In reality. except for proven abuse, there should be EQUAL custody as a norm.

I have seen many mothers get full custody even after they have been proven to be abusive to their children. In almost 90% of the contested cases, they get full custody.

Often after this, the father has very little contact with his children not because he does not want to, but because he is not allowed to. I have talked to hundreds of men who have reported that they can not see their children even with court orders.

In the event of primary custody being given to one or the other parent...the right to see their children by the NCP should be enforced just as much as child support

More important....more should be done to save marriages then to pick up the pieces afterward. Children NEED....BOTH parents!!!

2007-01-06 20:56:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Shared custody is the best for a child because they need contact with both parents regularly. Judges are doing joint custody now more than ever. Fathers should not have to wait and only see their kids 2x a month.

It has been proven that joint custody makes a huge difference for the child to succeed in life.

2007-01-06 20:39:26 · answer #2 · answered by Mommadog 6 · 2 0

it's not about good or bad parenting, in almost every case in almost every country the mother will be awarded primary custody of children. you may find it silly, outdated, ludicrous, sexist, prejudiced and so on but these are the facts- courts will and do in 99.9 % of all cases award custody to the mother-full stop. enough with the joint custody mumbo jumbo- it stands to reason that joint custody would be in the best interests of any child, this isn't rocket science, however unless agreed to by both parents (for joint custody) in the case of a court awarded custody suit the child will in 99.9% of all cases go to the mother- disagree all you want, bang that bleeding drum of piety from now until the end of time, read law journals- not your own version of pop psychology 101. it's all there in black and white. mothers get custody!!!

2007-01-06 20:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

If both parents are good parents they should never let any court decide primary custody, in fact why not give it to both parents and let them rotate parenting on a two weeks off two weeks on with parent off two weeks exercise parerenting on weekends. this will give both parents equal parenting time and responsibility allowing them to take pride in themself and there child, this also gives the child maximum time with both parents and the child deserves at least that cause they never wanted to divorce neither one of the parents..Parents have to THINK outside the box and not let a corrupt system exploit there children...yes i said corrupt and expoit...the state's of this country have an interest in your children.. a monetary interest as well as the attorney do.. the state makes hundreds of thousands of dollars on children of divorce and those born out of wed lock...most people are brainwashed with a jerry springer/maury pouvich way of thinking.
Look at the children in our society today...killing, raping. stealing, in gangs, teen pregnancy, dropping out of school etc. etc. these things are happening at an alarming rate. WHY? let's explore the so called (dead beat dad) phenomenon. WHY? are so many men dead beats (if it's true) who raised them? most often mom raised them (no disrepect mom's) but, we need to start looking at the whole picture or at least the parts left out. most young men raised are not taught about sex and most often times taught it's o.k. (boy's will be boy's) and they live experiancing a mom who talks badly of dad..this child can only identify with dad since he is male (and looks just like his dad..how cute) so he to subconciously believes "i'm going to be like dad" (remember boy's will be boy's) now on the ohterside what are our daughters learning....say it with me now (boy's will be boy's) so they to have no expectation from there male partners when it comes to parenting and most boys/men believe that when there child is born there suppose to go to the bar get drunk and handout cigars.
many women support this..(meaning the go have fun and celebrate) but, this is the most important time for the father to start the bonding process or should i say continue the bonding process ( it starts in the womb) now on the other hand the mother has the support of grdmom, auntie, girlfriends, even nurses and doctors to help learn and take care of the baby..example how many of you know someone (female) who has a child and when they have a headache or something and need a break will call the boy friend and ask if HIS MOTHERS HOME and can she watch the baby (instead of telling the father to watch the baby) or the father say's no cant bring the baby over cause his mothers at work. ( never dawning on him to take his child while mom is ill) cause he was never given the responsibility or has never been trusted with the responsiblity.
the state could easily fund classes for parents encouraging fathers to take part and teach them to be a parents better then the classes they have now so grdmom, auntie, girlfriends BACK OFF let dad step up and hold his child..encourage him to be more active and say no when asked if you could watch child and suggest dad do it. were creating a fatherless society

2007-01-06 23:20:23 · answer #4 · answered by quietstorm 1 · 0 0

im affraid to say no matter how good a Dad he is ( like me and Im not being vain) he will never get soul custody of the child coz thats the way the law is unless Mums a drugy or an alcoholic or a child abuser
Make me sick!

2007-01-06 20:33:07 · answer #5 · answered by jafsil 2 · 1 0

Traditionally the courts would favor the mother,but it all depends on the reasons and details behind the custody case.

2007-01-06 20:28:07 · answer #6 · answered by LS 4 · 0 0

ok right here's how that one and all works. Custody like baby help might want to be changed at any time, any time there is rationalization for a substancial replace it truly is. Having been by divorce myself and having effectively represented myself (no I easily haven't any legal education or adventure) in that divorce, i might want to strongly recommend that you stay the "sole custodial" ascertain. this does not recommend the daddy isn't entitled to visitation inspite of the indisputable fact that. It merely means that you're making each of the options as to his well being, faith, education etc. A father is entitled to "actual looking " visitation as long as there is no courtroom order saying in the different case. baby help is remitted by the state and has no concerning if the daddy has visitation. It does have bearing if the baby is residing with the daddy and he has "residential "custody. because you reported he does not then this is not likely that the state might want to scale lower back his baby help in any respect till you've been to conform to it. in case you experience the daddy is okay and sparkling, and that spending time such as his father does not position him in harms way then it truly is my own idea that a baby might want to spend time with the different ascertain. in case you imagine your ex isn't able to keep your baby secure from damage then say so in courtroom. you may keep sole custody of your baby, and nevertheless enable visitation with the different ascertain. have self assurance your instincts with the way you experience about your baby and how you imagine issues will be contained in the close to destiny. you may consistently bypass lower back and adjust something as your baby receives older too. The courts understand this and assume it. joint custody merely means that you both ought to communicate about each little thing in all judgements related to your baby. It does not mean that one ascertain has extra skill than the otehr. i wish this all is smart. i might want to signify a legal professional in case you may locate the money for one, it makes issues a lot a lot less stressful. yet when not maximum states do have loose legal professionals that could help you already understand yours and your baby's rights. strong success!

2016-12-01 23:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by northcut 4 · 0 0

What is wrong with 50/50 custody?

2007-01-06 20:36:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Children need love and affection from both mom and dad, but what they really need is a stable routine and to be resident with one parent and spend time with the other. I think kids should be with their mothers.

2007-01-06 21:37:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It should be the one that can provide the best for the kid

2007-01-06 20:34:54 · answer #10 · answered by jeff b 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers