Is Paul Pierce the single greatest celtic ever?

Question

Now usually when i ask this question im usually shot down with one name Larry Bird. However I ask You to look beyond the championships. If Bird and Pierce were on teams with the same talent level who is the better player?

Answer 1

The truth is (pun intended) not the best. U have to consider Larry the Legend, Bill Russell Bob Cousy, John Havilicek, Kevin McHale, Robert Parrish and damn the list goes on then maybe Paul Pierce.

He needs to win a championship but I don't blame him because of the lack of veteran talent on the squad. Also, come playoff time Pierce seems to choke.

Answer 2

No.

Bill Russell
Dave Cowens
Larry Bird

Answer 3

I think it's pretty obvious that Pierce is not the greatest Celtic ever. Just look at SOME of the names that came before him.

Larry Bird & Bill Russell (quite possibly the all-time greatests at their respective positions)

Then you have legends like John Havlicek and Bob Cousy, followed by tough nosed players like Robert Parrish, Kevin McHale, Dennis Johnson, etc.

Pierce is very good player, but I would not put him in the same thought, let alone breath, as Bird, Russell, Havlicek, or Cousy.

To me, this question is like asking if Kirk Hinrich is the best Chicago Bull ever?
While he's very good, the question doesn't even deserve serious consideration.

Answer 4

Whoaaaaa. carry on a minute, there, bud. i don't basically like the Lakers and that i do unlike Kobe...yet Kobe is the greater beneficial participant. enable's positioned it this form...Kobe is Jordan and LeBron is Dominique. Who'd you fairly have? LeBron is a threat on protection and slowly transforming into a jumpshooter-something he would not do nicely. Kobe is an wonderful defender, super shooter, and super penetrator. the only element LeBron has on Kobe is LeBron can play some factor. Kobe can, too, yet LeBron is greater of a factor-forward. If LeBron learns the thank you to play basketball fairly of dominating together with his actual qualifications, nicely, then, it incredibly is a distinctive tale. in case you place LeBron on the Lakers, that they had be center of the %. interior the West. in case you place Kobe on the Cavs, Cavs may well be 2 interior the East. no question in my techniques Kobe is the greater beneficial participant. LeBron has Ben Wallace (nevertheless a competent defender), massive Z (in a position massive guy on offense and protection who's 7 feet!) and a shitload of PG's who he hand-picked...Mo Williams, Daniel Gibson, and Delonte West. he's likewise have been given Wally off the bench as an incredible shooter. How is this a bad solid? Kobe has Lamar the wussy, Pau the "i won't be able to play interior the positioned up" and Bynum, who has basically performed a million/2 a three hundred and sixty 5 days of sturdy basketball. His PG is Derek Fisher. LeBron has greater intensity in an much less annoying convention. Kobe for the win.

Answer 5

Paul Pierce and Bird are not even on the same level. Bird is heads and shoulders above Pierce. That's like comparing Michael Redd with Michael Jordan.

Answer 6

Larry the legend Bird

Answer 7

Pierce's overall number may surpass Larry Bird's numbers some day but Larry is still Boston's greatest player.

Answer 8

paul pierce needs to do something to put himself in that catagore. as of yet, he has not done anything remotely close to that. a great player does a lot more than just score points, he makes his whole team better. paul pierce could not even hold the jock straps of the like of larry bird, bill russell, bob cusey. you cannot look past the championchips because that is what makes a player great as opposed to just good.

Answer 9

Bird/Russell will be much much more remembered for their talents than Pierce. In 30 years noone will even remember Paul Pierce. Everyone will still talk about Bird and Russell.

Answer 10

paul pierce is like a lil newb if u compare him to bird, bird is all around the best single celtic ever