English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-06 18:55:33 · 11 answers · asked by pnatt89 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Maybe "rich snob" is not quite right. I probably should have said "rich SNOB"!

2007-01-06 19:22:36 · update #1

rich bastard**

2007-01-06 19:23:01 · update #2

11 answers

Completely guilty on all counts.

Bowling for Columbine

A look at Bowling for Columbine (my main analysis to date). In producing his Oscar-winner, Moore altered history, misled his viewers, and edited the footage and audio in such a way as to reverse the meaning. In one case, he took a speech of a person he desired to target; the problem was that the speech was in fact conciliatory and mild. So he spliced in footage from another speech, cut out paragraphs, and spliced the beginning of one sentence to the ending of another. In another, when he wanted to criticize a political advertisement, but it wasn't as pointed as he wanted, he spliced together two different political ads, then added titling which was in neither.

Stupid White Men

A short review of his perhaps autobiographical Stupid White Men. Here we learn such shocking things as -- 200,000 Americans are dying of Mad Cow Disease and no one knows it; Bush secretly stole the election by having Florida bar convicted felons (which Moore maintains were great Gore supporters) from voting; Nader did the Demos a big favor by running in 2000; Enron is a great investment. Okay, Mike

2007-01-06 18:59:11 · answer #1 · answered by Yote' 5 · 4 3

... does not that's the purely suited sign of love on your us of a, for appreciation of it getting you throughout this fabulously prosperous place, to coach your compassion on your fellow countrymen... to place something lower back... by technique of offering to pay the bailout for them? not likely is it?! in certainty that's the alternative, an excellent variety of the fabulously prosperous pay easily sod all in tax - zip, nada, zilch. the perception that THE marketplace did this to reward some form of superhuman attempt, skills or point of IQ is a farce... there are probable 0.5 a dozen Leonardo da Vincis or Einsteins obtainable interior the third international who never had of challenge in existence... what a waste!! Judging by technique of extremely a number of the solutions right here we can see purely how extremely indoctrinated many people are. Arguments are actually not approximately helping your area / or political prejudices come hell or severe water, they're approximately good judgment, basic sturdy and what WORKS. the U. S. device has been shown a failure, and for evidence you purely might desire to examine the size of the derivatives concern, conservatively forecast to be around 5 x international GDP and extremely greater than the finished international dollar grant... there is not, and have never been a 'unfastened marketplace' mutually as opposition is project to vast cartels and government commerce fee lists - you could not have unfastened commerce and secure practices on the comparable time! in certainty the tip you could draw is that maximum of those people made their fortunes the two because of the fact the marketplace is incorrect, or because of the fact they screwed the 'unfastened' marketplace in some way... google Rockefeller + properly-known oil? Or Prescott Bush + determining to purchase and advertising with the enemy?

2016-12-15 17:46:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

michael moore hates the United States, hates freedom, and hates the Constitution.

he is an enemy of the United States, plain and simple.

liberalism is a mental disorder.

2007-01-06 21:47:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Absolutely, he claims to care for the Poor but im sure he would have Dogs attack any Poor person who comes on his property to ask him for help.

He doesn't care for the Poor, he doesn't care for Wounded Soldiers, he cares only for himself and all the attention and money he gets from making himself look like he cares.

Oh and he owns stock in Carlyle and Haliburton (which according to Michael Moore anyone who owns stock in either of those is Evil, except for Michael Moore cause he's holy and anything he does is ok even if it's evil for others).

2007-01-06 19:04:59 · answer #4 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 3 3

Anybody that makes several successful movies will be rich.

As far as a hypocrite, one doesn't have to be poor to care about the poor.

Yet somehow, Republicans have convinced millions of poor Americans to care about the rich.

2007-01-06 19:44:49 · answer #5 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 3 3

Mostly true - current indications are that his parents were married, so he's technically not a bastard. An @sshole maybe, but not a bastard.

2007-01-06 19:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 3 3

I think patriot would fit better. You guys just hate him because he points out the failings of the Bush administration.

2007-01-06 21:57:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

False. He only gets facts and does not base conclusions off the facts. He is not a conspiracy theorist. But; the only thing you have right, he is rich that bastard.

2007-01-06 19:00:27 · answer #8 · answered by Kitty 4 · 5 5

not so rich

2007-01-10 10:38:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes

2007-01-06 19:07:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers