English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now that Saddam is gone who do you think Bush will go after next?

2007-01-06 18:55:11 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

Neither one. Bin Laden has proven to be a "needle in the haystack." He has too many people who are willing to hide him and give him shelter. As for Castro, he is not going to live much longer. Already, he has turned over some of his power to others.

I think North Korea is next on the list. Bush could more easily convince the America public of the importance of it, mainly because of the nuclear weapons and the direct threats made by North Korea. Through various treaties, the U.S. is "obligated" to help defend both Taiwan and Japan. Many American may not realize it, or have forgotten, but the Korean War NEVER officially ended. Both sides, just agreed to stop fighting. That's why the U.S. still has troops in South Korea on the border with North Korea. Both sides are just staring each other waiting for the other to make one bad move.

2007-01-06 22:28:46 · answer #1 · answered by ces1958@verizon.net 4 · 2 0

Do you mean kill? The Iraqi government killed Saddam Hussein. Castro is already dying. Bin Laden has been a target since the early 1990s.

Bush will target Iran next. Another carrier is being deployed the Persian Gulf this month.

I found a report that indicates a third may be sent by March, but this resource is a blog.

2007-01-07 03:59:37 · answer #2 · answered by Lana Lang 4 · 2 0

Raoul Castro? Why no longer Alexander Lukashenko or Robert Mugabe? each usa has its bogey adult males. i in my view hate this 'Wild West' mentality that has grown up interior the West. And united statesa. isn't fullyyt in charge. British and different distant places government politicians are in basic terms as in charge. Gadaffi ought to circulate, Mubarak ought to step down and so on and so on. If there's a UN determination, it quite is in basic terms a fig leaf via fact we in basic terms circulate on and do besides the fact that we adore besides. however the factor that quite annoys me is the way politicians get severe on all of this and look to miss that that they have got been elected to unravel issues of their own usa too. And Tony Blair is the worst occasion. He did have some distant places coverage successes in Kosovo as an occasion. for sure no longer Iraq. yet for him to then circulate around moaning as he did that it become so confusing to get issues completed at abode now and returned, properly that to me says he become too busy in a foreign country. He squandered plenty by applying his messiah-like behaviour on distant places coverage. we've to get issues decrease back in attitude.

2016-12-12 05:55:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

President Bush want to see a prosper and Democratic Iraq. Every one who create hindrance will be on hit list. His mission is to make his country safer. He has taken aggressive stand which made him unpopular.

2007-01-06 19:14:38 · answer #4 · answered by snashraf 5 · 2 0

iran

2007-01-06 18:56:43 · answer #5 · answered by man_in_the_box2590 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers