http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/07/israeli-children-sign-their-missiles_18.html
2007-01-06 18:14:48 · 2 answers · asked by Judge 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
The picture at face value was really something with signing missles, and the expression on their faces were smiling, I wonder what they were thinking of to be smiling, cause war brings fear and not happiness.
I did read a lot of the blog, and some said they were dead shells that were laying around and some say they were live. I personally don't think they were dead shells, cause the tips of them were in great shape, I can't believe that a missle went through the air and even though it was dead still turned out in as good of shape as it was built.
2007-01-07 14:31:49 · answer #1 · answered by WV_Nomad 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that is blurred, that is noisy, that is low selection, it has jpeg artifacts, that is uninteresting, that is badly composed, It has NO "form". In different words: that is extremely distinctly undesirable. in case you opt for to understand what we actually think of, what's with all the thumbs down?! advance up! EDIT > i'm not being abrasive, i'm only telling you my common opinion. i would be much extra common with you in case you opt for - i don't evaluate your image to be the two paintings, or resourceful. It has no advantage. If a image like it is paintings, then sticking my head in a paper bag and farting is paintings!
2016-12-16 03:52:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋