2007-01-06 17:01:09 · 19 answers · asked by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
J. Michael Springman – Former career Foreign Service Officer with the State Department and the International Foreign Trade Administration of the Commerce Department. Former Consular Officer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where he supervised the issuance of visas. 20-year Federal Government career.
Video of Speech to National Press Club 6/10/02: "I used to be in charge of the visa section at the CIA's Consulate in Jeddah. ... There for a year and a half I issued visas to terrorists recruited by the CIA and its asset Osama Bin Laden. ... Fifteen of the nineteen people who allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA Consulate at Jeddah." http://youtube.com
BBC Interview 11/6/01: "In Saudi Arabia I was repeatedly ordered by high level State Dept officials to issue visas to unqualified applicants. These were, essentially, people who had no ties either to Saudi Arabia or to their own country. I complained bitterly at the time there. I re
2007-01-06 17:02:59 · update #1
What I was protesting was, in reality, an effort to bring recruits, rounded up by Osama Bin Laden, to the US for terrorist training by the CIA. They would then be returned to Afghanistan to fight against the then-Soviets." http://news.bbc.co.uk
Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. http://www.911truth.org/article
Bio: http://www.springmannslaw.com/Overview.shtml
2007-01-06 17:03:22 · update #2
How many of you who gave me thumbs down ...really love America? did any of you click on the links?
What sickens me is that the Republican party allows this raping of My Country to continue and does nothing to stop it.
2007-01-06 17:09:50 · update #3
Your not alone--it won't be till he's actually taken away in handcuffs that the rest of your kind get a clue--like some kind of super slow learning curve--thanks for setting the bar so high!!
2007-01-06 17:08:28 · answer #1 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I'm very opposed to the idea of repeated impeachments. We really ought to consider converting to parliamentarian democracy if we do that.
The odd thing is Bush is starting to conduct himself as if he WANTS to be impeached. I don't think the democrats really want to pull money away from the troops in combat operations. I don't think they want to impeach the president either.
But they may have already considered that they'd rather resort to the latter than the former.
2007-01-06 19:25:12 · answer #2 · answered by roostershine 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why would you want to waste so much money to impeach a president in the house but could not convict in the senate. it wpould waste time and money to do so and he would never get tried because he'd be out of office before it could start. he has less than two years keft and it would take that long to complete the impeachment process. it would tie up the congress for no purpose, and divert attention from the real needs of the country to go through the process.
2007-01-06 17:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by de bossy one 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This does not surprise me at all. Then again, I have always felt that our government knows a whole lot more than its letting on. I have a basic distrust of our government in general for these very reasons. We supplied Iraq with weapons to be used against Iran. Now we are at war with terrorists in Iraq and many of the Iraqi people. If Saddam was such a bad guy, why should we be a nation full of hypocrites and support him one day and kill him the next? If they are bad, they are bad. Period. I am not a republican, so I can't give you an unbiased opinion, but there is more to 9/11 than we know.
2007-01-06 17:07:54 · answer #4 · answered by David L 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
you stand alone,I dont think hes done any thing to call for an impeachmeny unless the democrats are looking for a 2 to 1 ratio,I think the impeachment idea came from Clinton getting impeached
2007-01-06 17:20:55 · answer #5 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think of we would desire to consistently strengthen Constitutional regulation, combating judges from making rules fairly than examining them, might desire to do each thing we can to stop the two fascism and socialism, however we would desire to consistently not foolishly think of that valid government won't have some issues in consumer-friendly with the two, and one-international government might desire to be stopped in any respect expenses. good to work out you settle with me in this. anybody that sells out usa, acts seditiousnly or traitorously, tries to help our enemies and harm our u . s . as a citizen might desire to be dealt with interior the cruelest way attainable for the time of a time of warfare. If it is President Bush (i think in "harmless until shown to blame", do not you?), then so be it. If it seems to be the completed liberal enterprise, (same rule!) then so be it. won't be able to have it the two approaches. Rule of regulation.
2016-10-30 05:24:55 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because this place is full of trolls pretending to be someone they are not. Besides, there are no impeachable offenses in which Bush has committed. Opinions and propaganda sites are not impeachable crimes.
2007-01-07 01:53:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a republican who thinks his party has left him in the dust... I would def like to see someone else in office instead of bush but I wouldnt want it to be anyone from the bush admin so I guess thats not gona happen... If you could impeach bush with a new election to go along with it I would say Go for it.
2007-01-06 17:11:01 · answer #8 · answered by magpiesmn 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No it is a waste of time and money, like the Clinton impeachment.
2007-01-06 18:04:10 · answer #9 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Get a life, you ask this once a week! Are you a "seminar Y/A user" Mr Lib?
2007-01-06 17:50:18 · answer #10 · answered by Cinner 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋