Do you believe that this world should ran without leaders?

Question

What type of world whould it bee,If every person were alow to do what ever they wanted to do ?

Answer 1

A small one.

Those who like to kill, would take full advantage. Those who like to fight back would also kill. Those who don't like to kill would be dead.

Those who like to steal would have more free stuff until they run into someone who believes in using deadly force to defend their stuff.

Those who like to drive fast would kill, be killed, or mamed for life-because there will be others on the road whith them doing what they want too.

Answer 2

There have always been leaders & followers since man existed. It is human nature to appoint the best qualified in the group to be the leader. It is also human nature for others to want that leadership position because they think they can do better. Others are content to follow along as long as it's good for them. When it is no longer good for them they either try to convince the leader to do differently or they support someone else that speaks to their needs.
Pure anarchy is a utopian concept that could never work because there will always be those that will do things contrary to the common good.

Answer 3

Indeed.Isn't that what democracy speaks about?Or at least on similar lines?

Who are leaders?They too are just humans.To even more broadly classify it they are also matter which exist.According to me having to follow a leader and having to do all that he/she tells as a dogma clearly displays INEQUALITY.

Why should we heed to the words of just a person who just tell us the way to go?He/she should have experience the pain,anger etc when he/she tells us something to do.

Also, leaders don't always show the right way around - for you see, every thing that we know is a mere illusion - a faint recognition of what the real matter is. And if its just mere illusions, "Half-truth is a whole lie" , right?What if he/she doesn't know the whole issue?Wont that person lead you to the wrong way?


How did our ancient ancestors survive?Did they have a leader?NO.They relied on their instincts and they survived , didn't they?

Therefore I strongly feel that we ,as humans , can survive on our own without any body's leadership.

Answer 4

No...I believe it is within human nature to have leaders and followers. There are those who need others to make the laws. And there are those who need to make the laws for others.

If there was anarchy, the world would be a mess.

Answer 5

That'd never happen. The most powerful would still take over. There'd be conspiracies and so on, although the world you refer to would be supposed to be lived individually. Economy as we knew it would fall apart. Imagine primitive ages all over again. Getting and cooking your own food. Making your own shelters. Protecting yourself from enemies and attackers. It'd be a terrible way to live. Mother nature would balance out the human population. United we stand, divided we fall.

Answer 6

In general most people,(majority) gravitate to authority, discipline, like unruly children. instinctively we need a leader. Not everyone is cut our for that role. And we need to interact as a team like ants. It is only human to have an assemblance of order like any animal. The problem is there is too much animal in most and not enough human and logic.

Answer 7

If everyone were allowed to do whatever they pleased, there would be a serious lack of education resulting in people who ask incoherent questions in something only resembling proper language.

Answer 8

i dont believe the world would be any better without a leader but worse
some people are reckless
but some leaders are unnecessary

Answer 9

A silly question? I take it?

Answer 10

We need laws.Where would we be without laws....FRANCE!