http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070106/ap_on_re_us/first_baby_dispute_4
2007-01-06 16:44:54 · 5 answers · asked by snuggler 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Well, the rules stated that the mother had to be a legal U.S. citizen, which she was not, and the prize money has to be awarded to the parents, not the baby, so I'd say that don't deserve it, simply because the mother did not meet the eligibility requirements.
Toys-R-Us should have checked her eligibility requirements before they let her participate in the tie-breaker, at that was a failure on their part, but they still shouldn't get the money.
2007-01-06 16:56:47 · answer #1 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be a tough decision ( publicity wise ), but you have to go by the contest rules.
2007-01-07 00:55:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thats so mean!! She rightfully owns that money that runner up has!! She was born in the US give her the money!!
2007-01-07 00:53:58 · answer #3 · answered by Princess Peeps 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the baby was born in the US doesnt that mean he/she is a US citizen?
Give her the damn money!
2007-01-07 00:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rules are Rules, in any contest.
2007-01-07 00:59:04 · answer #5 · answered by ole_lady_93 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋