English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WILL THEY BE THAT ANGRY IF A NEOCON IS HELD ACCOUNTABLE? I GUESS THEY WANT THAT "THE COUNTRY HAS TO MOVE ON " BS WE HAD UNDER NIXON/FORD.

HOW ABOUT HOLDING CRIMINALS ACCOUNTABLE FOR ONCE NEOCONS?

A BJ IS MINOR LEAGUE IN COMPARISON TO WHAT THESE MAJOR LEAGUE CRIMINALS HAVE DONE!!

2007-01-06 16:24:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Drawing out the retards in droves again I see--why people are so willing to stand behind their ignorance and promote Neocon/con stupidity over Patriotic responsibility boggles the mind.

Warning that Nov. 7th was gonna happen wasn't enough.
Watching the Congress do what the people have asked them to and watching them pass Pro American/liberal backed legislation
in the first three days--and their still not getting it.

Keeping score and checking the list as the issue's are tended to --priceless!!

The inevitable revealing of the prosecutable offenses committed by the Simian Boy King in a series of Oversight hearing's is such a good thing to look forward to. The nightmarish beliefs those of us that knew the consequences of electing this weasel into office the minute he got the nomination have watched all those fears develop into reality and then some.

2007-01-06 17:22:49 · answer #1 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1 5

bush won't be impeached so the neocons can't use that against the dems.
impeachment would be time consuming (about 2 years) and a waste of money (50 million at least). he would be gone before they could try him in the senate, and it would fail since they need 67 (2/3) super majority to convict him. they only have 50 dems and one independent (former dem lieberman). no republican would vote to convict so the trial would also be a waste of time and money by the senate.
if the dems hold anyone to account for the last six years of incompetance, some neocons will go down, not because of their stance, but for their arrogant and incomprehensible stupidity in following an arrogant and incompetant president who still remains just as arrogant and incompetant and who is not likely to change in the next two years.
so if anyone gets angry, it shopuld be the people who should get angry, not at others, but at themselves for believing what they have been so foolish as to believe.

2007-01-06 16:39:52 · answer #2 · answered by de bossy one 6 · 0 1

Why are the liberals so angry? Why all the all-caps?

This is America. It's like the weather. If you do not like the temperature, wait a few hours.

Stop acting like anyone has done something specifically to offend you. You are safer because we are fighting a world threat.

And stop trying to raise a cry of false witness to impeach our President.

2007-01-06 16:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 3 0

It wasn't the sex act, it was lying under oath to avoid being held culpable in a different lawsuit that was above and beyond anything that you think Bush should be impeached for.

How about impeaching every Democrat that also voted for the war in Iraq. All but one did. I guess you don't want to hold those "criminals" accountable...

2007-01-06 16:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

i don't comprehend approximately impeaching Obama only yet, yet his healthcare, fairly the numerous healthcare projects working around in Congress are a contravention of the 10th modification. The shape is very particular relating to the powers of the federal government, and that's for a reason. It became to sidestep such them from assuming implied powers.

2016-10-30 05:20:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Again,accountable for what?Give a specific charge and you might get a specific answer.
By the way,President Clinton didn't get in trouble for the BJ except maybe with Hillary,but I doubt it.)He was impeached for committing felony perjury,despite what the "unbiased"media would have you believe.

2007-01-06 16:36:14 · answer #6 · answered by Michael 6 · 5 1

Your lack of intelligence is readily apparent. Bush is far from being a conservative. He is a liberal who has turned his back on the true patriots.

You, however, are an enemy of the United States. The enemy within is alive and well.

2007-01-06 16:56:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

So you want the liberal hypocrisy to be blatantly evident?

Because your great Democrat Hope Nancy Pelosi said she wouldn't impeach the President.

I know, you don't understand how it's hypocritical, but think about it...you MIGHT get it.

Caps lock is on the left hand side of your keyboard above the shift key, by the way.

2007-01-06 16:28:23 · answer #8 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 6 2

1st off learn what a Neocon is. Using terms properly increases the chance that intelligent people will take you seriously.
2nd, learn what is & is not a crime. Lying under oath is a crime. Implementing policies that you don't like is not.
3rd, exactly what threats are you refering to & who made them?

2007-01-06 17:03:15 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 1

I've decided your problem is you have a complete lack of respect to authority. It will one day ruin you.

2007-01-06 16:26:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

fedest.com, questions and answers