Watching some post game interviews from the seahawks about :
1. How well they played
2. How they jelled at the right time.
SHUT UP! You had lost the game, only a Bill Buckner-esque play saved your sorry butts!
Am I wrong?
2007-01-06 16:08:42 · 18 answers · asked by West Coaster 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
They didn't play very well in my opinion, and that's the opinion of a Seattle fan. However, if Romo hadn't botched the place holding, they still left too much time on the clock and Seattle could have scored again.
But to answer the question, yes they should. They still have to worry about Chicago/New Orleans and if they don't play any better than this game, they probably won't make it.
2007-01-06 16:20:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YEP! You are 100% wrong in every way! You obviously missed the end of the game! The Seattle Seahawks actually WON this game and they advance to the next round of the playoffs!
It doesn't really matter what kind of "weird-esque" play wins the game, according to the current NFL rule book, the ONLY thing that matters is that you WIN the games!
Seattle has had a terrible season. Even despite the injuries they have probably played even close to their talent level maybe once or twice the whole season, (and one of those was the loss to SD)! Yet they patched up their secondary with bubble gum and chicken wire, Matt and Shaun pretty much stank and they STILL pulled out the key playoff victory.
They stopped a key first down by inches that would have killed them off, they stopped Romo after the botched FG and recovered the fumble which saved their season, then they ran it out to the 22 to save the game at the very end, they beat the Cowboys and they advance: THEY DID ACTUALLY PLAY WELL, idiot!
The also JELLED AT PRECISELY THE RIGHT TIME, idiot!
Therefore: YOU ARE WRONG; IN FACT 100% WRONG.
I have nothing against the Dallas team, they fought to the bitter end like true warriors! They were humble in defeat, even Terr-ible Owens actually acted and spoke like a gentleman. My heart weeps for poor Tony Romo, he didn't deserve to be the goat on that play. I repect the Cowboy team. But for ignorant loud-mouth Cowboy fans like YOU, I have NO sympathy - like the mouse said to the elephant:
"suffer, baby, suffer!"
2007-01-07 00:39:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think YOU should shut up. A football game is 60 minutes long. The cowboys went home 5 seconds early. If the Cowboys were so good then that "Bill Buckner-esque" play would never have happened.
2007-01-07 00:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by right_wing_extremist_2008 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, the Cowboys had the game lost many a times too.. without a few lucky games for them they wouldnt of even had that opportunity to win it there.
Secondly, I saw Hasselbeck talking about how crappy he played after the game, so you dont' know what the eff your talking about. Watch the interviews then talk. They know they didn't play well.
Thirdly, if they did play well they would have anhilated the Cowboys, being that the cowboys played to the height of their very low potential.
Better luck next year (but really not because i hate the cowgirls :)
2007-01-07 01:11:54 · answer #4 · answered by artrickwo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yo. Last year, I was a fighting advocate of how the Seahawks should've won the sb. this year, I supported my team the cowboys, and although im sad they lost, the seahawks played no better. Yes, Romo blew it at the end. But I forgive him for that. But those dang seahawks were outplayed by a fraction more by the dallas cowboys. end of comment.
2007-01-07 00:44:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, I could care less about either team; although I was rooting for the Seahawks. But, if they are depending on another botched play to win this piece, then I feel sorry for their fans.
2007-01-07 00:17:36 · answer #6 · answered by Tyese 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because they HADN'T and DIDN"T lose the game.
Games are 60 minutes long and the better team tonight was the Seahawks. Dallas didn't measure up.
2007-01-07 00:11:40 · answer #7 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yea because they did not lose the game and they were not going to lose the game. Cowboys suck and the Seahawks suck but the boys just suck a little bit more. Let them talk all they want, they are just going to get beat next week.
2007-01-07 00:13:10 · answer #8 · answered by LSUtigah21 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
well its obvious that your a cowgirl fan, because i don't think any of them thought they played a great game. and yes we did have the game lost, but we also had it won a couple times too ohh and we did win. quit crying and focus on those Texas rangers i think they might take it this year lol
2007-01-07 01:13:04 · answer #9 · answered by benriedell2002 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let them enjoy it. they will be crushed next round regardless of who they play
I feel bad for bill buckner. His name has become a synonym for suckiness
2007-01-07 00:15:35 · answer #10 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋