I found this movie presenting ideas I'd read were on the way to being proven to be true....Dr. Candace Pert has written Molecules in Emotion and is respected for her research in mind/body field whereas other people in the film have no credentials nor do their ideas hold validity. I was told this movie is completely pseudoscience... Have any of you researched this area....or have read similar ideas in this movie that have been proven by now.
2007-01-06 15:14:09 · 2 answers · asked by phoenixbirdlc 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
I haven't seen it yet, so I can't give specifics, but from what I've heard, it's worse than pseudoscience. It's a mixture of science, pseudoscience, fiction and fantasy, all presented in the same way so they look like science. It's an effective method for causing confusion.
2007-01-07 00:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by Frank N 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's an odd movie all round, especially when the person who makes the most sense is the one chanelling someone who died 30,000 years ago...
2007-01-07 02:45:12 · answer #2 · answered by barry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋