2007-01-06 14:16:38 · 17 answers · asked by mindy 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Kobe is better than bibby and Odom does more than Artest
martin is improving and scores a lot but the laker edge doesn't go away when you compare him to the overall player walton is
than there's the front court where the lakers abuse the king front court like a foster child in the child welfare system
hell I am the only one who remembers that Jerome freaking James got 30 million dollars just because he consistently abused the king front court for 20+ points in the playoffs not to long ago?
the lakers have the better players, system, and teamwork
2007-01-06 15:47:40 · answer #1 · answered by truthistold2u 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually this year the kings are not living up to their full potential but remember that b.miller has not been healthy all year and artest hasnt been there all year ..the kings lost by 4 the other night but that was without a legitimate big man(b.miller) that they could match up with their centers... with millers 14 points a night and their healthy lineup martin bibby artest miller k.thomas they could legitimately be a powerful team right up there with the lakers and suns and they are not as deep as the lakers on the bench but they do have salmons garcia abdur rahim and corlis williamson on the bench and they will improve as the season moves along... the lakers are trash and will always be trash..just wtch and see them collapse
2007-01-06 21:13:02 · answer #2 · answered by brian g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. what kind of question is that? the Lakers have a better record than them, and the Kings dont have as much potential as the Lakers
2007-01-06 15:59:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not this Year, LA is much deeper and stronger. The Kings have no bench.Take Bibby away and they would have about three wins this year. Lets go head to head, LA won on the Kings home court 132-128. LA is back and on a roll. They will be a 4 or 5 seed while the Kings will be lucky to make the playoffs.
2007-01-06 14:31:25 · answer #4 · answered by Doc Hollywood 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. I am sorry, IMO the Kings' defense was supposed to be good with Artest on the perimeter and Shareef on the post but they just doesn't do it night-in and night out.
Heck, sometimes they doesn't do it for 48 minutes.
2007-01-06 16:52:36 · answer #5 · answered by Opas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends if the players have a good game or not. but overall, i think the lakers are better
2007-01-06 14:29:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. The Kings just have not been plying up to thier full potential.
2007-01-06 14:44:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
lakers are better than the KINGS!!!
2007-01-06 16:14:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
THE LAKERS HAVE A BETTER RECORD.
2007-01-08 08:07:18 · answer #9 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there are. They are underachievers at this point in the season.
2007-01-06 14:21:26 · answer #10 · answered by Play Ball 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋