which is BETTER? WWE or TNA?

Answer 1

WWE

Answer 2

If you like wrestling TNA is much better.
TNA has better wrestling in 10 minutes than wwe has all month.

If you like tons of storylines, and would rather lose 10 minutes of your life listening to an old man talk about nothing, or care about who is
"pretend dating" backstage. Then WWE is the show for you.
EX. this month New years resolution has 2 possibly decent matches.
TNA's Final resolution has at least 5.

Answer 3

Me I prefer tna do to the talent and that that company is more hungry.yes they don't have the same money as the wwe. But they are getting a better fan base.And they are starting to do more shows outside of the impact zone and rumor has it that they are going to start showing house shows from bigger areas like the mci center and the staples center..

Answer 4

what kind of question is this?, WWE is a lightyear better than TNA. TNA is boring, hardly even has a rivalry.WWE has so many rivalries going on, thats what makes it fun to watch.

Answer 5

well the only good wwe right now is smackdown, in fact smackdown is the only thing keeping wwe alive right now because raw sucks absolutely sucks. look at all the losers on raw. cena,dx,spirit squad,kenny dykstar,eugene. i swear mcmahon is really starting to lose it. and tna has the action and better wrestlers and more entertainment value and tna is future of professional wrestling.

Answer 6

have you lost it mamas boy wwe is way better than tna give me 1 reason dx sucks or even cena how bout ric flair hes 16 tyme champ nobody in sports entertainment has toped that how boutcryme tyme they kick butt only bout 500 people go to tna and tna isn't world wide tna dosen't go to iraq to support the troops tna infact doesn't go anywhere but universal studios so ya wwe is way better and raw kicks butt!!

Answer 7

TNA is terrible

if you have ever been unfortunate enough to have seen it, only about 200 or 300 (exaggeration) people show up to it. Cheers are half-hearted. it is a pathetic imitation of the wwe

Answer 8

one pro wrestling isnt fake go watch czw and watch one of there death matchs then tell me its fake....

ok back on topic i like both of them wwe has good storylines and alot of golden name wrestler's tna has alot of good trick's with wrestling move's and they have some good story lines but tho to vince russo being the head chief of the company that means ur going to see some weird **** in tna for awhile intil they fire him

tna is very good but they cheap shot at wwe every chance they get which i think it's dumb that's like going to a man with a knife and calling him name's your looking to get killed

which vince can do easy....so who's better well to tell u the truth intil u watch ROH or CZW u will think they both suck i think u should watch Czw its one of the realist wrestling companys to day dont belive me check out some of there history they have had a few knife pull's and stabb's in there matchs yea its crasy but not fake at least

Answer 9

WWE but Vince should get rid of all his wrestlers and divas who are not bringing business to his company and recruit talents who he think that can be profitable but he should let J R help him deciding this because he is a genius.

Answer 10

TNA

Wwe has more cash, more writers, more talent and keep pumping out the same garbage.

TNA has amazing young talent and better athletes. But they also hired Russo so I may have to change my answer shortly.

Answer 11

WWE. Listen, the wwe has started, what, like since 1963. They have DX, REAL Canadians(since when is a canadian from wall street?), better storylines, REAL monsters(kane and undertaker and boogeyman), and, they're richer. F.Y.I, JBL can kick the crap out of don west.