2007-01-06 13:14:46 · 17 answers · asked by donronsen 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In regards to question 3, how do you think history will treat the Decider..er.
2007-01-06 13:19:53 · update #1
The whole lot of them should be brought up for war crimes, which they (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al) have committed - if not in this country, other countries are starting to get their ducks in a row to do just that. The evidence is undeniable that WE have started an unjust war, WE are imprisoning people - even US citizens!!! - without formally charging them, in secret prisons on foreign soil, WE subject them to torture..... WE better be getting it together to look facts straight in the eye and stop this "patriotic" delusion that our president is "above the law" - he's certainly created enough of them to put himself there - which is yet another one of his underhanded maneuvers.
And one more thing.... it is my firm belief that "you folks" out there in the cyberworld who still seem to defend him are nothing but paid public relations spin doctors who try to keep this country under certain delusions - such as anyone in their right mind having anything left for this administration than contempt. Thankfully, there are still those who will think for themselves, get their information wherever they can, and make up their own minds about the facts they're confronted with.
The only ONLY way I could ever be proud of this man is if he surrenders to authorities, abdicates his throne and confesses to the many ways he's f&*%ed his country, his people, and the people of other countries. I want him to repeal the Patriot Act, stop wiretapping my phone, stop snooping in my computer & mailbox, stop telling me lies, stop making me paranoid, stop making this world such a hostile place....
There. You wanted to know.
2007-01-06 13:55:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
None of the three, he hasn't committed treason or done anything worthy of impeachment. It is also far too soon to start to debate whether he is the greatest President ever. Those are some pretty large shoes to fill (look at Lincoln, Washington, or FDR) and I don't think Bush will fill them.
2007-01-06 13:38:02 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
really the blended Congress and Senate can impeach the President. courtroom cases take years. for this reason, Bush seriously is not impeached. this is too late to do something yet censure him. the all of us is unable to do something about the President except salary a revolution and overthrow the authorities. maximum folk of people are too apathetic to do something about authorities (or a lot else that they locate incorrect with u.s.) except pout lower than their breaths even as sitting of their Layz-Boys and gazing their massive demonstrate TVs. they have really performed it once, even as a handful of Southern States seceded from the Union, and then with the full help of their elected (State and local) politicians.
2016-12-01 22:41:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1 and 2
2007-01-06 13:16:19 · answer #4 · answered by dstr 6 · 3⤊ 9⤋
1. The Atlanta Hawks will win the NBA Championship before George W. Bush is IMPEACHED.
2. George W. Bush HAS NEVER COMMITTED TREASON and is just doing his responsibilites as President of the United States of America.
3. It is too early to say if he is the Best President Ever but he is a Great Leader who has compassion and care for the American People.
2007-01-06 13:19:57 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 6⤊ 5⤋
None of the above.
2007-01-06 13:29:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well there is no proof of any crimes committed (other than weak opinions and propaganda sites) 1 and 2 is a no go, and choice #3 is pushing the limit, he is a good president, but not a great one.
2007-01-06 13:19:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
Ya gotta commit crimes in order for 1 & 2 to take place, so Ill just say that President Bush is a very good Pres, and leave it at that!!!
2007-01-06 13:18:53 · answer #8 · answered by Humor me.. 3 · 6⤊ 5⤋
He has one year left. It would just be a big mess trying to impeach him.
2007-01-06 13:17:49 · answer #9 · answered by kberto 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He is a man with strong moral convictions who at least has had the *&%$ to stand up for what is right, even if it is not always popular. History will someday see this.
2007-01-06 13:21:35 · answer #10 · answered by from HJ 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋