English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

46 answers

agree with the execution for what he did, but disagree with how publicly advertised it was. they wonder whats wrong with american society today....they wonder why kids bring guns to school. turn on your news! you can watch saddam be hung!!!!

2007-01-06 12:49:47 · answer #1 · answered by divinemadness 4 · 3 1

I AGREE whole heartedly. Anybody who would disagree just doesn't understand how bad of a person he was. HE RANKS AMONG THE WORLD'S WORST MASS MURDERERS. Pol Pot, Adolf Hitler (an idol of Sadddam), Joseph Stalin, Saddam Hussein all killed without compunction. If that doesn't warrant a hanging - than nothing does. Ask any historian or educated person in his dealings and you will get the same answer. Those of you who disagree - you really need to do some studying and facing of the facts. A person such as Saddam would have no hesitation in killing any one of us. He killed without reason, feeling, or hesitation. He killed his first person at the age of 11. From there, he become a hitman for different political factions. His blatant disregard for human life helped him develop into a true psychopath. Killing people whether innocent or guiltly didn't bother him. I don't know whats scarier, that Saddam was left to live as long as he did or that there are people who actually felt that Saddam (one of top 3 or 4 mass murderers of all time) should have been left to live. Here is a quote from Saddam about Stalin , a hero of his -"I like the way he governed his country."

2007-01-06 20:01:17 · answer #2 · answered by Christopher U 2 · 1 0

I disagree with the USA overthrowing the President of another country, if the people of Iraq wanted him gone; the Iraqis should have overthrow him themselves.

What Bush started due to the 9-11 attacks lead to more deaths ( 3000 ) of Americans inside Iraq than the 9-11 attacks did, still the plotters of 9-11 are free

2007-01-06 14:10:50 · answer #3 · answered by hitan_2005 3 · 0 1

i don`t think anyone has the right to decide who should live and who should die
is this the new democracy that hundreds of thousands have died for it`s a travesty of justice and saddam was the only one there to show dignity
i hope people who are all for it realise that the Iraqis they are supporting (the ones chanting at the hanging )ar the ones behind the carnage there now and killing Americans as well as Iraqis
in what kind of democracy do goverment officials behave like a linch mob
And for all you lot who think the world is better now maybe you should understnd that the ones in charge of Iraq now are the radical Islamists that the" war on terror "is supposed to be about

2007-01-07 00:46:29 · answer #4 · answered by keny 6 · 0 0

The hanging of sadham was a disgrace, you may say that he deserved to die for the genocide he committed, however these deaths were the vicarious result of the exploitation of the west by religious, political and economical fundamentalist of the global elite and military industry. sadham was a puppet, was used and expended. (that's if hes really dead). he was hung so quickly, on eid so there was a reduced chance of riots, and so no further evidence was exposed in further trials incriminating the west.

2007-01-06 13:18:25 · answer #5 · answered by breakthesystem 1 · 0 1

Personally I don't care if he lived or died, we live in North America "not" in the middle east. I don't think that killing the man was the right answer, he was 69 years old he was going to die soon anyways. Who's next Bin laden or Castro. When are we as a society going to learn that we are not Gods & we can't pick & choose who lives & who dies. We talk about all the crap that is going on over seas When are we going to start worrying about our home land exp... Homeless, gangs, ect... That should be the real question.

2007-01-06 13:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Sadham is now Happyham


ps. agree

2007-01-06 13:30:00 · answer #7 · answered by 99tzm 3 · 1 0

Disagree, He is now another reason for war and revenge, bush and Blair have killed more people Irak than he did, He should have got a life sentence.

2007-01-06 13:10:46 · answer #8 · answered by Friends unknown 2 · 0 1

Disagree.

2007-01-06 12:42:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

I agree with the sentence but not how it was carried out

2007-01-07 02:20:59 · answer #10 · answered by The Fat Controller 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers