Or was a country involved or a band of badguys
2007-01-06 12:15:13 · 19 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bin laden and al quidea. Bush nor any republican ever said saddam or iraq was a part of 9-11. They did say and was right that he supported terrorism and was making and trying to accumalate WMDs
2007-01-06 12:25:13 · answer #1 · answered by rizinoutlaw 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no question that osama bin laden (who is saudi by birth) and the saudi arabian nation as a whole are responsible for the 9/11attacks.
if saudi arabia had produced one or two of the 9/11 attackers i could overlook the obvious - but they produced 15 of 19 hijackers.
this means that the culture at large in that nation approved of what was happening.
saudi arabia is a terrorist breeding center - they have also been called the 'epicenter' of funding of worldwide terror (by National Public Radio).
2007-01-06 12:23:32 · answer #2 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Directly, Osama bin Laden and his buddies in al Qaeda are responsible for 9/11. Indirectly, a whole slew of incompetent morons are responsible. You be the judge of who those people are.
2007-01-06 12:44:20 · answer #3 · answered by Leroy Johnson 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is still mostly believed that it was Osama bin Laden and his group of nutcrackers (either the Taliban or the al-Qaeda, and I'm not sure what the difference is).
There hasn't been any proof that Saddham was involved at all. Of course, we haven't found bin Laden yet, so we can't ask him, either.
So basically what it all comes down to -- Nobody knows.
2007-01-06 12:18:39 · answer #4 · answered by Paige D 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Who knows at this point. Maybe none of the above. But, best guess it was Osama bin Laden and either black ops or al-qaida or some combination of the two. I am not sure we will ever know or be convinced.
2007-01-06 12:55:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the final time we've been attacked to everywhere close to this degree (hundreds of casualties on U.S. soil)... become pearl harbor... and we invented the atomic bomb to drop on them... all we did become deliver some 10000 troops into Afghanistan after Osama, and as quickly as we chased him out of Afghanistan into Pakistan, we actual went to Iraq and suggested "we will enable Pakistan handle it"? could FDR have in basic terms enable the jap circulate in the event that they ran to Pakistan too? i do no longer think of so... and the easy actuality is... no person understand precisely how good al-queda is... the place they're, who's in it... and what they could be making plans... so it quite is quite confusing to understand how vulnerable or good they nonetheless are... and Osama's value that's why we did no longer circulate after them interior the 90s quite... via fact we did no longer dream they could pull off a 9-11... now they have shown it... and we are nonetheless unlikely after them? YOU DO understand... Clinton suggested "Osama's no longer that substantial" interior the 90s... see how properly that labored out for him? Now Bush, with much greater CRYSTAL sparkling information of their ability after 9-11 says the comparable?
2016-12-12 05:40:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Jewish tycoon who benefit ted to the tune of 7 billion dollars for reconstruction contracts for the world trade center and the Jewish nation for having the U.S. go the first leg against the Arabs.Every one but the BIG MONEY PEOPLE will suffer threw enormous population decline.
2007-01-06 12:29:35 · answer #7 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bin Laden and Al-Qaida, they claimed the responsibility.
2007-01-06 12:18:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bin Laden/Al Qaeda but their was another country (friendly to the US) that knew about it in advance and did nothing to warn the US.
2007-01-06 12:19:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bin Laden and his gang are the soul parties responsible.
2007-01-06 12:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋