2007-01-06 11:38:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No amnesty. It would be just plain wrong. Millions of people, including those from Latin America, have legally immigrated to the US and become a productive member of our society. We love them, it's part of our rich heritage. Illegals now, suppress wages in certain careers. If they give them social security, that will hasten the bankruptcy of the program (since Congress won't fix it). Besides, there is no way to track these people. The system is overloaded as it is, adding 12 million into it is just absurd.
2007-01-06 11:58:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sturdy question, sturdy submit! All which you're saying, i've got faith is fairly plenty the fact. For it sluggish now I quite have been conscious of this merchandising out to specific hobbies that don't encompasss the wellbeing and welfare of maximum folk of tax paying, criminal voters interior the u . s .. that's time for a significant rebel or overthrow or for and accounting to be held/mandated by applying the time-honored human beings of united statesa.. it must be too previous due. we've been screwed, blued and tatooted by applying our government for the finished thing approximately huge, wealthy persons and their companies right here and in a foreign country. What to do? balloting doesnt look to get the job completed any greater beneficial.
2016-12-12 05:40:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about the people in Europe or Asia or Africa that have been doing it the correct way and waiting to come to America. Why should those who just walk in get in before them. And why should they be able to be under the radar as far as the government is concerned? Let's rethink this to make it fair for all.
2007-01-06 11:46:34 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bama Fan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
Unfortunately your question is moot because Bush has already agreed to open the border with Mexico rendering amnesty meaningless. While we debate the pros and cons of rascism and a border fence, Bush has sold us all down the Rio Grande.
2007-01-06 11:44:40 · answer #4 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding ,(NO) But I am a federal employee and ever day I watch the contractors bring illegal aliens into our building .
This week janitors , next week the gardeners, if they think they can replace me let em try .
2007-01-06 11:48:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amnesty only to those who can prove they will be persecuted in thier own country, or to those who were born and raised here.
2007-01-06 11:42:52 · answer #6 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep all federal jobs will henceforth be staffed by illegal aliens .
2007-01-06 11:43:49 · answer #7 · answered by prole1984 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer deportation and no amnesty.What we will get is total amnesty.
2007-01-06 12:20:08 · answer #8 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NONE!
If we give them anything, it should be a swift kick in the *** straight back across the border.
2007-01-06 11:41:19 · answer #9 · answered by BORED AT WORK 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i want to burn trespassers at the stake
2007-01-06 11:43:22 · answer #10 · answered by ken y 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋