170.
Mine is 147
2007-01-06 10:56:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2007-01-06 10:49:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by wind it up 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
IQ Tests and Measurements of Genius
Interesting IQ Facts:
* The first Experimental Psychology tests were performed at the University of Pennsylvania around the year 1890.
* The Binet-Simon test was developed in 1905 to help the French government identify retarded students in need of alternative education.
* Classic formula: IQ = Mental Age/Chronological Age X 100.
* A normal intelligence quotient (IQ) ranges from 85 to 115 (According to the Stanford-Binet scale). Only approximately 1% of the people in the world have an IQ of 135 or over.
* Half of the population have IQ’s of between 90 and 110, while 25% have higher IQ’s and 25% have lower IQ’s
Hi IQ Societies Factoid: The highest IQ was probably held by William James Sidis (1898-1944). His IQ was 200+.
2007-01-06 10:53:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Over 140 - Genius or near genius
120 - 140 - Very superior intelligence
110 - 119 - Superior intelligence
90 - 109 - Normal or average intelligence
80 - 89 - Dullness
70 - 79 - Borderline deficiency
Under 70 - Definite feeble-mindedness
2007-01-06 10:50:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by LoneStarLou 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
IQ stands for intelligence quotient. Supposedly, it is a score that tells one how “bright” a person is compared to other people. The average IQ is by definition 100; scores above 100 indicate a higher than average IQ and scores below 100 indicate a lower that average IQ. Theoretically, scores can range any amount below or above 100, but in practice they do not meaningfully go much below 50 or above 150.
Be very cautious in using a descriptive classification of IQ’s, such as the term "genius". The IQ is, at best, a rough measure of academic intelligence. It certainly would be unscientific to say that an individual with an IQ of 110 is of high average intelligence, while an individual with an IQ of 109 is of only average intelligence. Such a strict classification of intellectual abilities would fail to take account of social elements such as home, school, and community. These elements are not adequately measured by present intelligence tests. Furthermore, it would not take account of the fact that an individual may vary in his test score from one test to another.
IQ scores are very controversial. You may want to also consider multiple intelligences, which looks at intelligence from a different perspective.
2007-01-06 11:00:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
140
2007-01-06 10:49:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by CPT Jack 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
140
2007-01-06 10:49:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by mizchulita 3
·
0⤊
0⤋