English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Too close to call?

2007-01-06 10:21:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Which group would lead us to world destruction quicker?

2007-01-06 10:22:21 · update #1

14 answers

Since they are like Siamese twins, a horse a piece, 6 of one-half dozen of another...who can even say there is ANY difference in their "scary" quotient.

2007-01-06 10:25:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 8

Neither one is a threat.

First Camels can't swim the Atlantic

Second Cons will settle down into a more Eisenhower style of Redpublican party after Karl Rove and his pet boy leave the Whitehouse.

Go big Red Go

Go big Red Go

2007-01-06 19:13:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

How about a legitimate answer instead of just partisan name-calling.

I am more afraid of liberals because of their approach towards terrorists. They are the ideology of appeasement and cowardice. They want to hold hands with our enemies plant flowers and burn the American flag with them. If our military, the greatest in the world, was unleashed against the terrorists and their supporters (read Iran) we could destroy them. But the liberal agenda in this country has become one of pure opposition to conservatives, not the advancement of our country. And they will manuever to lose any battle we fight as long as it is lead by a conservative. Liberals want to fix the blame not the problem. Their only goal is to discredit conservatives and their leaders, it is purely and ironically the ideology of hatred. They preach love but express hate toward the President, conservatives, Republicans, southerners that happen to live in conservative states, anyone that doesn't fall in line with their extreme ideological views. We can find and kill our enemies outside of this country but the true enemy is inside our country and we can't hunt them down and kill them. Terrorists don't scare me they are simple cowards that can be killed, it's the cowards that we can't kill that scare me.

2007-01-06 19:59:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I will answer this question with an analogy: The terrorists are like fire, and the liberals (RADICAL liberals) are like gasoline. The former can do a significant amount of damage by itself, but with the latter it can do even worse; it can spread faster, broader, and more severely. Hopefully you follow me.

2007-01-06 21:00:29 · answer #4 · answered by Leroy Johnson 5 · 1 0

Although I am afraid of neither, the terrorists are a bigger threat.

2007-01-06 18:24:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

I'm more afraid of the terrorists because they live in our White House. 9/11 was an inside job. search 9/11 Truth. Peace out.

2007-01-06 18:29:31 · answer #6 · answered by protocols 2 · 2 8

You are more afraid of the dark.

2007-01-06 18:41:59 · answer #7 · answered by Joe Prosnick 5 · 2 2

Republicans the party now ruled by fear

2007-01-06 18:50:24 · answer #8 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 2 3

Hard to say. I'll go with terrorists, because they're really intentional about it. Liberals just want to erode, erode, erode, until it's too late.

2007-01-06 18:28:51 · answer #9 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 4 5

obviously, you're more afraid of freedom.

2007-01-06 18:40:31 · answer #10 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers