who should the US invade next in their war on terror?
should they have the right to use nuclear weapons?
should they stick round to try and restore order after they invade like in iraq or should they just leave it for them to sort out?
how many terrorists should they kill before they can say they have won the war on terror?
would you enlist in the army if u knew u were going to invade a specific country that you had a personal interest/dislike with?
2007-01-06 10:05:04 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
last time i checked they invaded iraq
2007-01-06 10:08:14 · update #1
nah, man im not enlisting
im from oz, just wonderin what all u guys think
2007-01-06 11:08:13 · update #2
oh, and hugo chavez is the president of venezuala not peru
2007-01-06 11:20:21 · update #3
Israel.
2007-01-06 10:38:00 · answer #1 · answered by BRITS OUT 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Let's take this one question at a time...
1) Mexico. Most of 'em live here anyway. May as well carpet bomb the whole dung-heap and start over... Then, North Korea. At least they HAVE weapons of mass destruction.
2) Yes, because if we invade a country that have nukes THEY WILL USE THEM. You're a (soon to be irradiated) fool if you believe otherwise.
3) Stick around to sort it out, like we did in Europe and Japan after WWII. Look how good it turned out for all concerned.
4) ALL terrorists (men, women, AND children) must die before we can claim we have won the war on terror.
5) Yes, I would re-enlist. And you???
2007-01-06 10:22:19 · answer #2 · answered by Sean T 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nothing is called a war on terror, how can I fight with something I can't see?
US shouldn't invade any other country. Enough blood.
What did US get from such war except more terrorism?
And what did US do with other terrorists all over the world?
Iraq is a complicated situation, but sooner or later US will leave, so leaving now is better.
When in need to use nuclear weapons, I think no one will give a look for the rights.
2007-01-06 10:21:12 · answer #3 · answered by saeed 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
nicely in the journey that they could, why do not they do it?? in the journey that they invaded KSA, usa will connect the historic previous (each of the international places will attack usa because of many applications: a million. Islamic applications: both holy mosques 2 skill applications: KSA is the perfect exporter for Oil. consequently, each usa will stand with it.because if KSA stops exporting, the oil expenses will bounce to an fantastic expenses i think you already know now why not
2016-12-01 22:31:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Iran.
2. Leave
3. As many as it takes
4. Only if I knew we were invading France.
2007-01-06 10:14:28 · answer #5 · answered by Daz2020 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I vote for Peru. That damn leftist Hugo Chavez and his oil. He nationalized oil. He is asking for trouble. How dare he actually do something for his own country and help the poor? How dare he call Bush "the Devil"?
He is gonna get it now!
2007-01-06 10:14:07 · answer #6 · answered by The Prince 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
France and Russia
2007-01-06 10:15:24 · answer #7 · answered by FlyMan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about the oil companies or the pharmaceutical companies. They're the biggest threat to the US of all.
2007-01-06 10:13:38 · answer #8 · answered by tHEwISE 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I imagine Iran's dictator will be overthrown. Syria will fall next...
2007-01-08 12:00:34 · answer #9 · answered by quarterback 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1400 Pennsylvania Avenue--is the headquarters of the false war on terrorism--start there.
2007-01-06 10:16:45 · answer #10 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Iran or Syria
2007-01-06 10:09:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋